Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
> I would expect that clients can use this info to request for > x-serverinfo more or less automatically. In that respect it may alter > what goed on trhe wire. Am I wrong? Maybe it is also the right place for > a server to indicate whether this information is also part of the > information sent automatically when x-info-accept=any has been added in > the request. It's not going to be automatically, unfortunately, due to the split between SRW's requests and SRU's requests. For example, I keep the following additional information in my ZeeRex file to do that mapping: <supports type="extension" c3:type = "response" c3:sruName = "info1-serverVersion" c3:function = "implementationResponseHandler" c3:sruFunction ="implementationMapHandler"> info:srw/extensions/1/ident-v1.0 serverInfo </supports> type == Which sort of extension is it sruName == What to look for with SRU function == Function to call to implement this extension sruFunction == Function to call to turn SRU into internal SRW form Secondly there's no space in the base ZeeRex to indicate whether or not that particular extension is part of the accept-any 'package'. Given the nature of accept-any, I don't think it's even particularly useful, in the same way that we don't have a way to say exactly what happens when you omit the index from a query... any way to specify it would be overly complicated for little gain. However servers are free to add extensions to the zeerex data, so long as it doesn't obscure the structure or the information (see the docs for the details) Rob ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask]) ,'-/::::. http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805 ,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool ____/:::::::::::::. I L L U M I N A T I Cheshire3 IR System: http://www.cheshire3.org/