 |
 |
Michele R., The reality is that the item is identified with location information in another place in the finding aid. Therefore, do not use the physloc element. Either: 1. use the ref as a child of unittitle. 2. use the ref as a child of note/p. The rest is fine. My 2 cents. Michael Ferrando Library Technician Library of Congress Washington, DC 202-707-4454 --- MicheleR <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hello all -- > > Suppose I have the following in a finding aid for a collection: > > > Correspondence/Subject Files > ... > Elizabeth Press - Box 1 > Emily Dickinson Bulletin - see Morey, Frederick L. > Enslin, Theodore - Box 1 > ... > > > For the Emily Dickinson Bulletin with the "see" reference, how > might you > interpret that in EAD? The reference itself is a REF element, no > problem > there -- but what to wrap it in? If it were a "see also" I would > use a NOTE > element, to point out additional information of interest to the > researcher, > but in this case there IS no material at "Emily Dickinson Bulletin" > just a > pointer to somewhere else. > > As of now we're using PHYSLOC (see below) on the theory that the > "see" > reference functions as a locator to tell the reader where the > material > actually is, but I wondered what other approaches might work, or > what others > have used. > > > <c02> > <did> > <unittitle>Emily Dickinson Bulletin</unittitle> > <physloc>see <ref target="flm">Morey, Frederick > L.</ref></physloc> > </did> > </c02> > > > Many thanks -- > > Michele Rothenberger > Special Collections Research Center > Syracuse University > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com