Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
Feedback on SRU 1.2 proposals: - For level 0 conformance I would prefer to let it be the clients responsibility not to send unsupported queries. Level 0 should lower the implementation barrier and the requirement that a diagnostic is returned for unsupported queries requires the query to be parsed only for the diagnostics and not for functionality. - I would prefer the exchoed request to be very strongly recommended to allow clients to rely on it. I found that the use of Mozilla extensions that support SRU queries can become quite powerful when some context information can be "stored" in the response via the echoed request data. I agree with the other proposals as far as they have been described. I have an additional proposal: I expect that the availability of recordSchema's can be record specific. An optional field indicating for a record the possible recordSchema's would allow the client to request the right recordSchema. As nextRecordPosition is eliminated the use of recordPosition should be recommended very strongly. Besides that it makes it easier for clients to handle situations that a record is skipped for example because it is not available in the right recordShcema. Theo >>> [log in to unmask] 27-05-2005 20:29 >>> A list of proposed changes to SRW/SRU/CQL to be applied to the next version, either 1.2 or 2.0, is available at: http://www.loc.gov/srw/next-version.html These proposals have been developed by the SRW Editoral Board. Several are still under discussion, and not all are well-developed yet. We would like feedback on these, comments and any other suggestions, and would like to have substantive discussion at the June meeting. --Ray