Print

Print


>>> [log in to unmask] 05-08-2005 11:20 >>>
>>... but how much better to have a schema that lets you include the
>>record-level metadata along with the data.
>
>Like a METS wrapper around record + metadata? :)
>
>http://www.loc.gov/mets/

Will METS then be the requested record schema, independend of what is
in it?
An alternative to METS might be MPEG-21 DIDL. We are starting to use
that for compound digital objects but it could very well be used for
compound metadata records.

Theo