Me three.  Working with schemas every day, I'm fine with either notation, but for someone who doesn't work with them every day... just say what you mean, don't make them search for an XML schema tutorial.

--Robin

At 11:33 AM 9/12/2005 -0400, you wrote:
I agree, but then I think that defaulted attributes are one of the
annoying features of XML and SGML.  

-----Original Message-----
From: PREMIS Implementors Group Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Caplan
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 11:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PIG] opinions on schema style

Gee, actually the second is easier for me to read, as a human, because I
don't have to look up what the default is.

p

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> Consider the following:
>
>  <sequence>
>    <element name="a"/>
>     <element name="b" />
>     <element name="c" />
>     <element name="d"  type="anyURI" />
>     <element name="e" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>     <element name="f" minOccurs="0"/>
>     <element name="g"  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> .....
>
> It says: "elements a, b, c, d occur exactly once; e is mandatory and
> repeatable, f is optional (not repeatable), g is optional and
> repeatable; all are type string except d which is type anyURI."
>
> And consider:
>
>  <sequence>
>    <element name="a" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" type="string">
>    <element name="b" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" type="string"/>
>     <element name="c" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" type="string"/>
>     <element name="d"  minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" type="anyURI" />
>     <element name="e" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" type
="string" />
>     <element name="f" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" type="string"/>
>     <element name="g"  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"
> type="string"/> .....
>
> It says exactly the same thing.   Which one is more readable?  I.e.
which
> one of the two styles better facilitates comprehension?
>
> Why would you want to say it in the second form when you can say it in

> the first?
>
> Obviously my perspective is a bit different, that human readability is

> a critical element in the ultimate success of these schemas --  Let
> the machines do the hard work.
>
>
> --Ray
>