Print

Print


Message
although I am partly living in Cologne, I think that K�lsch should be dealt with in another part of 639.
 
Christian Galinski

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ISO JAC Voting Member List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of H�vard Hjulstad
Sent: Montag, 19. Dezember 2005 13:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [JACVOTE] ISO 639 JAC Ballot 2005-11 - K�lsch

ISO 639 JAC Ballot 2005-11 - K�lsch
 
Dear JAC voting members,
 
Please vote on the following ballot by 2006-01-20.
 
The item was submitted for discussion on the JAC list on 2005-11-17, based on a request dated 2005-10-11. There has been no contributions to the discussion on the JAC list.
 
Ballot:
 
Your name:
 
(A) Inclusion
(1)
___ I am in favour of including "K�lsch" in ISO 639-2.
__ x _ I am opposed to including "K�lsch" in ISO 639-2.
Comment:
 
[Inclusion in ISO 639-1 is not balloted.]
 
(B) Identifier
(2)
___ I am in favour of the identifier "ksh" for "K�lsch".
___ I am opposed to the identifier "ksh" for "K�lsch".
Comment:
 
(C) Names
(3)
___ I am in favour of the English name "K�lsch".
___ I am opposed to the English name "K�lsch".
 
(4)
___ I am in favour of the French name "k�lsch".
___ I am opposed to the French name "k�lsch".
 
(5)
___ I am in favour of the indigenous name "K�lsch".
___ I am opposed to the indigenous name "K�lsch".