 |
 |
I agree. --Glenn -----Original Message----- From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rebecca S. Guenther Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:32 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [ISOJAC] Probably resolved ISO 639 item - Norfolk Havard: That makes sense to me. I assume you will respond to the requester? Rebecca On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, [iso-8859-1] Håvard Hjulstad wrote: > Dear JAC members, > > Following the submission of the enclosed message there were a few comments to the effect that the requested item is encoded in ISO 639-3 as "pih" = Pitcairn-Norfolk. > > Unless someone comments to the contrary effect within 14 April 2006, I will "park" the item and consider the proposal rejected as far as the encoding of a new item is concerned. I will also not propose to include "pih" in 639-2 unless a JAC member specifically asks for it. > > Best regards, > Håvard > > -------------------- > Håvard Hjulstad > Standard Norge / Standards Norway > direkte tel / direct tel: (+47) 67838645 > mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > http://www.standard.no/ <http://www.standard.no/> > -------------------- > >