 |
 |
I won't repeat Mike Richter's comments -- they are all on the mark. I've had a good deal of trouble getting the labeler to identify and LightScribe media correctly, but otherwise I've had no problems. It's not as good as a thermal printer, but it's much, much less expensive. The labels are (to me, and I've used a good thermal printer as well) very crisp, with good legibility even with 4-point type. I like to pack everything I can on the label, and that kind of font size is critical. It can be a pain, especially if you need to do a lot of disks, but if you need the kind of sharpness it can provide, it's a good, cheaper alternative to thermal. Pete Tinker Mike Richter wrote: > Tom Fine wrote: > >> http://www.lightscribe.com/ >> >> Obviously, I don't think this appropriate for archival stuff, but do >> you think it could effect audio quality on client discs? Not sure >> how, except if a burn from the top could effect how the bottom is >> read in some drives. >> >> -- Tom Fine >>