Print

Print


      Sorry, folks.  Obviously not meant for the list.

-- Jim LeBlanc


At 10:33 AM 4/25/2006, you wrote:

>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2
>>X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=0 
>>adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-06041100 
>>definitions=3.0.0-06042501
>>X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=0
>>                          adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx 
>> engine=3.1.0-06041100
>>                          definitions=3.0.0-06042501
>>Date:         Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:36:15 -0400
>>Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sender: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
>>X-PH: V4.1@filter02
>>From: Jim LeBlanc <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Series Authority Work: Series Treatment 
>>information in Series Authority Records
>>Comments: To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>List-Help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=PCCLIST>,
>>            <mailto:[log in to unmask] PCCLIST>
>>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>List-Subscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>List-Owner: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>List-Archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=PCCLIST>
>>X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.1.0.0, Antispam-Data: 
>>2006.4.25.33109
>>X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.1.0.0, Antispam-Data: 
>>2006.4.25.35108
>>
>>Sarah-
>>      And this about the backlash against Def Phat Cool Cats ...
>>
>>-- Jim
>>
>>
>>At 05:13 PM 4/24/2006, you wrote:
>>>The DCM has explicit provisions for recording national-level, Library of
>>>Congress, and PCC local decisions for form of numbering and tracing
>>>practice in SARs.
>>>
>>>In the SAR template that is supplied with the RLIN21 Cataloging Client, the
>>>prompted field 645 includes "$5DPCC" and when users automatically generate
>>>authority records from 4XX or 8XX fields, this value is also supplied
>>>automatically.   RLIN21 users can themselves remove this value from
>>>templates used for series authority records.  To prevent this value from
>>>being prompted in generated records will require a system change that
>>>cannot be implemented by May 1, 2006.
>>>
>>>Antony's message says that "the Library of Congress will continue to
>>>process and redistribute these [series authority] records as part of its
>>>regular file distribution." What should users do about national-level and
>>>LC decisions when doing maintenance on existing authority records or
>>>creating new ones?  Will LC reject LC/NACO records that contain "$5DPCC" or
>>>"$5DLC" in any of the 64X series numbering and treatment fields?  I didn't
>>>see any mention of this in the recent flurry of remarks about this LC
>>>decision.
>>>
>>>Ed Glazier
>>>Principal  Analyst
>>>RLG
>>>2029 Stierlin Court
>>>Suite 100
>>>Mountain View, CA 94043-4684
>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>(650) 691-2261; fax (650) 964-0943
>>
>>
>>**************************************************
>>Jim LeBlanc
>>Head, Database Management Services
>>Library Technical Services
>>110A Olin Library
>>Cornell University
>>Ithaca, NY 14853
>>
>>Phone: (607) 254-5290
>>Fax: (607) 255-6110
>>E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>http://www.library.cornell.edu/tsweb/