Just back today from a short (too short!!) vacation.  I'm adding some 
comments on Amy's comments from last week, which I'll try to do without 
flaming ;-)

> If there is a new, distinctive series title to be established, do so with
> the macro, reprogrammed so that t it won't supply a source for the series
> statement.   Does it really matter whether the statement comes from the
> series t.p., the t.p., or the cover?   A title is a title ...

I think the answer to Amy's question depends on what "really" means.  The 
current rules for selecting the series title proper prescribe a preferred 
order of sources, with the series t.p. being first, the t.p. being second, 
etc.  Having the exact information of which source has been selected is 
probably necessary only when the form of the series title varies between 
or among sources.  Having the information enables us to retrospectively 
figure out occasional problems that may arise regarding series.  Not 
having the source is much more likely to require later additional effort 
retrieving issues of a series if a question arises than having the 
information present in the authority record right from the start would.

If we are going to eliminate recording the source of the series title, 
then why would we continue to bother to record the source of an author's 
name, which usually is taken from the t.p.?  I don't think it's too much 
of an effort to correct the source "ser. t.p." that is inserted 
automatically by the OCLC macro if it is not the actual source of the 
series title.

> If the title is not distinctive, add the AACR2 form of some distinguishing
> body in ()'s.

Generally speaking, I have no problem with this.  Except that some times 
adding a body is not sufficient to make the title distinctive and 
provisions would need to be in place to add something different or 
something in addition to make it distinctive.

> If there are variant titles, either in one publication or over time, use
> judgment about whether there is a name change or not, and either make
> cross references or another AR linked with see also's.   Do not agonize
> between these two choices--either works in guiding users to tracings.

Since series can be cataloged as serials, the rules for treating title 
changes must be the same.  I happen to think consistency in application of 
title change rules is important, so here I personally think that some 
agonizing is necessary.  This is particularly true for those libraries 
that create both a bibliographic record for the series cataloged as a 
serial AND individual records for the parts of the series.  The series 
access points and decisions about major title changes must be identical.

> Make whatever other references are judged useful to get users to the
> tracings.

I wholeheartedly agree that a liberalization of the rules and restrictions 
on making references would serve users well.  We cannot expect 
non-catalogers to know that certain kinds of references are not made, even 
when it's highly likely that users search under them.  A good example is 
when the series title proper is in one language but the authorized 
qualifier used is in another, e.g.

Report (Brottsforebyggande radet (Sweden))

In a case like above, I think a reference such as

Report (National Swedish Council for Crime Prevention)
Report (National Council for Crime Prevention (Sweden))

would actually be very useful references to have in our catalogs to help 
users, although they are references that are not currently permitted by 

> Add the AR to the authority file, and move on.

And a corollary to this might be that if creating a series authority is 
going to cause a lot of agonizing and take several hours of a cataloger's 
time, then perhaps the effort in establishing that heading is not 
warranted and the bib. record should not be contributed as a BIBCO record.
Catalogers should be empowered to judge for themselves when they would 
be better spending that time creating other bib. records and authorities.

--Adam Schiff

* Adam L. Schiff                     * 
* Principal Cataloger                *
* University of Washington Libraries *
* Box 352900                         *
* Seattle, WA 98195-2900             *
* (206) 543-8409                     * 
* (206) 685-8782 fax                 *
* [log in to unmask]           *