Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started. LISTSERV 16.0 - ZNG Archives



On 7/26/06, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Mike Taylor wrote:
> >Robert Sanderson writes:
> > > While we're changing relation semantics, I'd like to propose that
> > > <> be deprecated in favour of 'ne' for not equal to, to be
> > > consistent with 'eq' for equality.
> >I am not so fond of this; can you say more in favour of it?
> It seems strange to me that equality is 'eq' (a string) but inequality
> is a combination of the special characters < and >.
> More consistent to me would be == and !=, == and <>, or 'eq' and 'ne'.
> But 'eq' and '<>' seems similar to having '>' and 'lessThan'...
> understandable but inconsistent.
> Rob

And I'd personally like to see full consistency along the lines of
'lt', 'le', 'gt' and 'ge'.  Or, perhaps, the addition of those
relations to text semantics instead of numeric.

Mike Rylander
[log in to unmask]
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer