Mike Richter wrote: > > > Poorly recorded discs are vastly more sensitive to failure over time > than those recorded with low error rate. In an attempt Hi, Mike. What do you consider to be low (or acceptable) C1 and C2 error rates? I've been running CDSpeed on my discs, which appears to give a quality score of "0" if there are any C2 errors at all. Others, please feel free to chime in as well. Warmly, Christie Peterson Project Archivist, Muskie Archives & Special Collections Bates College 70 Campus Avenue Lewiston, ME 04240-6018 (t) 207-753-6918 (f) 207-755-5911