Print

Print


Belonging to the "digital natives" group, I must confess that I grow very
tiresome after four or so hours of reading from even some of the best
monitor situations.  Give me book, however... four hours and I'm just
getting started!

D. Blake Werts

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Digitizing libraries


> Just to be clear, I'm not saying I'd read a book this way but ...
>
> Internet Explorer 7 has a screen-type enhancer feature that works very
well, at least on my generic
> Dell flatscreen 19" monitor.
>
> I still prefer printed words on white paper. I'm old enough to be what the
tech guys call a "digital
> immigrant" vs. today's kids who are "digital natives," so maybe they
prefer to read on-screen.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Digitizing libraries
>
>
> > On 19/12/06, Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:
> >> Okeh...for what it's worth, an idea I dreamed up as far as "digital
> >> books"...!
> >>
> >> My idea is something along these lines...
> >>
> >> "DigiBooks" would be something like text equivalents to iPods. They
> >> would be available in a few book-approximating sizes (say 6"x9" up to
> >> 8.5"x11") with larger machines offering larger type. There would be a
> >> page-sized LCD display; some models would literally be "read-only,"
> >> while the fancier ones would include a "Clipboard" (for copying
> >> selected content) and a small keyboard (for taking notes or making
> >> "annotations"). The basic files would be in the standard .pdf
> >> format... if that doesn't allow the Edit functions, the text could
> >> also be available in straight-ASCII (no illustrations) text characters
> >> for use in Find and Copy operations.
> >
> > The problem with all ideas for digital books is the poor quality of
> > current screen displays.
> >
> > Typical resolution is only around 110 dots per inch at best, whereas
> > computer printers are from 600 dpi upward. This makes reading long text
> > files on a screen tiring and uncomfortable.
> >
> > When they start making 1200 dpi screens, printed books will have some
> > competition.
> >
> >
> >> These would be about the same size and weight as "hard copy" books...
> >> and could be read in the same locations (you couldn't take a DigiBook
> >> in the shower with you, but that also applies to paper books...!).
> >> Larger-screen models could be sold which would allow the display of
> >> two facing pages (folks read paper books both ways!). Of course,
> >> the extent to which content could be copied and privately stored
> >> (the fancier machines would have this capability, along with a
> >> hard drive) would be limited by copyright laws. Note that .pdf's
> >> can include illustrations, graphs and such...so the digital pages
> >> would look just like the originals. The .pdf filenames would also
> >> be stored with copied text or entered annotations, so a DigiBook
> >> and its augmentations would be associated by definition.
> >>
> >> DigiBooks would be sold on "flash memory" cards (just like digital
> >> photos are by their cameras) and the DigiBook "reader" would be
> >> equipped with such a slot. There would also be connections (USB
> >> ports?) so a regular desktop or laptop computer could be used if
> >> the reader preferred.
> >>
> >> Problem is, I don't have the techie know-how to build any of this...
> >> so if anyone out there in Radio-Land does, feel free to take my idea
> >> and run with it! Just give me some credit (and a little of the
> >> cash...?!)
> >>
> >> Steven C. Barr
> >>
> > Regards
> > --
> > Don Cox
> > [log in to unmask]
> >