As I am processing a collection of audio recordings, I can't help but wonder if there is a crosswalk 
between MODS and EAD? As MODS is based on MARC21, I'm assuming the crosswalk is already 
and inherently built in to the EAD document if one was using MARC21 @ relatedencoding in 

However, in this case I feel MODS elements would describe items in a clearer fashion within the 
finding aid.  For instance, in <dsc>at <c03 level=item) MODS elements would fit audio recording 
items more clearly. 

While the upper elements in EAD serve a very significant purpose, perhaps MODS can serve the 
lower elements a bit better. Is this possible without using METS as the overall infrastructure and 
instead using EAD?

Is there a wrapper in EAD where I can describe certain features in a MODS format? Is there a 
crosswalk between MODS and EAD?

I realize these questions may be futile given relatedencoding=MARC21 may perhaps solve this 
problem, but I can't help but ask anyway just out of sheer curiosity. Has anyone else thought of 
combining the two for describing sub-components in EAD? 

Does this proposition seem futile or ridiculous to well-versed EAD users and/or MODS users?

Thanks for any advice and thoughts. 

Farris Wahbeh
Archive Manager
Creative Audio Archive