Martin -- If what you're trying to do is include record level metadata with a response record it's a fairly straightforward process. Use the extraRecordData parameter which you'll see described in the parameter table in the result set model section (that you cited), more fully described at http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/extra-data.html.

--Ray

----- Original Message -----

From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Martin Morrey

To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]

Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:54 AM

Subject: Record Metadata Schema (was Re: "collection" context set)

I think we could also make use of elements from the Record Metadata
Schema, http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru-spec.html#resultmodel

Do you have any advice on how to combine elements from the RMS with the
standard SRU Result model,
http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru-spec.html#resultmodel?

At first glance, its not quite clear to me what the relationship between
these two things is.

Many thanks,

Martin

Rob Sanderson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:28 +0000, Martin Morrey wrote:
>> Rob Sanderson wrote:
>>>> The aim of Intrallect's "collection" context set is to allow queries to
>>>> be limited to sub-collections within a repository.
>
>>> How would that differ from
>>> collectionName and collectionIdentifier in the record metadata context
>>> set?
>
>> I think it is the same thing. Glad I asked!
>
> I think so too :)
>
> Rob

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Morrey, Product Director, Intrallect, http://www.intrallect.com
[log in to unmask], Tel: +44 870 234 3933, Fax: +44 1506 505 117
----------------------------------------------------------------------