From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad Hello, Parker Dinkins wrote and quoted me: > > I have only heard rumours that one or the other sound restorer > > uses this feature, but I find it essential (and have one). > > George, please let me dispel any rumors! > > This is exactly what I was describing; originally I did this with the > CEDAR > AZ-1, but now I use CEDAR Cambridge Phase Corrector module. CEDAR have > renamed the process, since 'azimuth correction' was not as accurate as > 'phase correction'. > > All of the processes I described previously are the ones I now use in > CEDAR > Cambridge (with optional modules). Note that I find it helpful to > auto-balance L-R levels as part of the processing chain, prior to summing. ----- well, I do this manually, because many grooves are not 45-45. > > And now that we have gone brand-specific, perhaps we'll hear from others > using Cube-Tec, etc. > > http://www.cube-tec.com/vpis/restorationvpis/azimuth.html > ----- on the other hand, may not the rumor now be "I've heard rumours that one or the other sound restorer still does not use this feature ...."? Also I should note that as a researcher and lecturer I would not be able to depreciate a Cambridge suite, you need transfer work turnover to do that. Kind regards, George