 |
 |
Yep! The schemas do not permit a string value directly under <extraResponseData> but expects child xml elements so <extraResponseData>some string stuff</extraResponseData> should not validate against the schemas However, <extraResponseData> <foo:myExtraStuff>....</foo:myExtraStuff> </extraResponseData> Will validate - what you stick under foo:myExtraStuff (string, XML, mixed) is your own affair, and if you allow both string encoding or XML underneath that, how you request that is also your own affair. Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rob Sanderson > Sent: 26 July 2007 17:15 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: No RecordPacking information in ScanRequest > > Isn't extraResponseData (etc) always returned as XML? > > Rob > > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:16 -0400, LeVan,Ralph wrote: > > > But, there is extraResponseData in a ScanResponse, and I need to know > > how to return that, as a string or as XML. Right now, I’m using the > > default assumption that SRW returns strings and SRU returns XML, but > > it seems like the client should have as much control over how > > extraData is returned as they do over how records are returned.