Interesting one. I _think_ that the ZeeRex fragment you included below is Just Plain Wrong, and that you can't have the same index name occurring within two <map>s, but that's really a question for Rob Sanderson, who led the ANSI/NISO-Z39.92 standardisation of ZeeRex. Rob? _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Unhappily, it coincided with Gascoigne attempting to set fire to best friend Jimmy 'Five Bellies' Gardner's nose in a Newcastle nightclub" -- The Guardian, 13th September 1998 Roger Wallin writes: > Thanks for the answer, > > before I continue, you should know that I have just started to work with > these concepts so there could be really easy answers, as I haven't > necessarily yet understood the whole concept. > > So concerning "DC.identifier" I should just make an assumption that it > searches in some of the server indexes (chosen by us) and there doesn't > have to be any descriptions, at least none standardized description of > this assumption? > > I have been told to use the XML below, but isn't this wrong as it says > that "DC.identifier" is the same as ISBN and ISSN, and those are actually > completely different indexes? > Or does it say that searching for DC.identifier the access point is both > ISBN and ISSN? > > I'm probably thinking too mathematical.... > > Regards RogerW. > > > <index id="7"> > <title>isbn</title> > <map> > <name>isbn</name> > </map> > <map> > <name set="bath">isbn</name> > </map> > <map> > <name set="DC">identifier</name> > </map> > </index> > <index id="8"> > <title>issn</title> > <map> > <name>issn</name> > </map> > <map> > <name set="bath">issn</name> > </map> > <map> > <name set="DC">identifier</name> > </map> > </index>