 |
 |
My apologies for the Dutch mail, as Olaf is my colleague I was too quick in sending the email as I was under the impression that I answered Olaf personally! My answer was that in our e-Depot the original name is often a generated batch name without meaning, so the usefulness of representing this is doubtful. Kind regards, Barbara Sierman Digital Preservation Officer Koninklijke Bibliotheek PO Box 90407 2509 LK Den Haag, The Netherlands +31 70 3140109 [log in to unmask] www.kb.nl > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: PREMIS Implementors Group Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Namens Olaf Brandt > Verzonden: woensdag 23 januari 2008 12:41 > Aan: [log in to unmask] > Onderwerp: [PIG] originalName applicable for representations? > > Hi List, > > the EC had some discussion about making originalName applicable for > representations. There was the wish to make this available, because in > environments where data are exchanged between digital archives names or > identifiers may change. If these data are handed over to the original > archive this might be relevant infomation to know. So what do you think > about it? Are there any suggestions or recommendations? > You may find more information about originalName on page 2-34 in the > Data Dictionary: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf > > Olaf