From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad


Bob Ohlsson wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From joe salerno: "...Shortly after that film was made the lacquer
> recording
> process must have become popular, making the film quickly outdated..."
> I can remember reading somewhere years ago that the use of lacquer masters
> for replication didn't happen immediately because of quality issues. Does
> anybody know anything about this?

----- I think it has to with the fact that the hot stylus technique did not 
get used until 1948. The noise level when cutting wax was 4 dB lower than 
when cutting lacquer cold. The above figures are from memory only. However, I 
do know that the principle was invented early 1920s by Miessner.

At EMI, lacquer was used for colonial recording from the late 1930s; I 
suppose this logistic choice was sensible and outweighed the increased noise 
that would be masked by the shellac mixture. And the end users were probably 
not esteemed as being quality-conscious.

Kind regards,