 |
 |
Nope... and I looked. I made a comment to George that maybe he might consider doing such a paper and I believe there was interest there... Now if he only had the time! Cheers! Rob _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Rob Poretti Sales Engineer Cube-Tec North America Vox.905.827.0741 Fax.905.901.9996 Cel.905-510.6785 _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ -----Original Message----- From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Sam Sent: August 19, 2008 3:08 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The Hope of Audacity... At 09:36 AM 8/19/2008, Bob Olhsson wrote: >Many of us have been holding developers' heels to the fire on this issue for >a decade and great strides have been made by the most common pro developers. >A very simple, although obviously not conclusive test is to record a 16 bit >source in a 24 or 32 bit file and count the active bits that come out which >should still be 16, assuming dithering has been disabled for test. Do you know of any paper--I would assume in the JAES--detailing the problem, progress, or lackthereof with hard science and data? Of course, I'm asking for something besides the previously mentioned talk George Blood gave at the conference this year.