Print

Print


Hi Steve:

I don't recall the article mentioned. Perhaps the gentleman will produce a copy of it.

It's all a mute point anyway, Universal does not own the rights to the Ricordi material so it will 
never be issued on CD, SACD or anything else from Universal as far as I know. As to what happened to 
the master tapes, I have no idea. I would say the bottom line is, anyone interested in seeing this 
material out on CD or SACD needs to find out exactly who owns the rights to Ricordi's material now, 
and contact them. Both EMI and Universal, for instance, have been known to license material for 
"special markets" releases. If one could get a reasonable enough license, one could sell niche 
material like this online, either as high-resolution downloads or as print-on-demand CD's like 
ArkivCD. The librettos and artwork could be made available as high-resolution PDF's for download, 
thus saving one of the major up-front costs of releasing operas on physical media.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Abrams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Living Presence Opera sets


> Forwarded from Opera-L
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Max Paley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Steve Abrams" <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 7:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Bastianini's studio RIGOLETTO with Kraus and Scotto-- what year?
>
>
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2008, at 8:37 PM, Steve Abrams wrote:
>>
>>> I have been in touch with Tom Fine, who is the son of Wilma Cozart  and C. R. Fine.  He has 
>>> consulted the official sessions book of the  Mercury Living Presence recordings and confirms my 
>>> assertion that  Rigoletto was recorded in 1960 at the Teatro della Pergola in  Florence 
>>> beginning on July 2nd.  The full dates were July 2-7 and  9,10.  He does not believe Max Paley's 
>>> claim that his mother  contradicted the official sessions book and claimed the recording  was 
>>> shifted to a nearby warehouse.  The recordings were co-produced  with Ricordi and the ownership 
>>> eventually reverted to Ricordi.
>>>
>>
>> The article including the interview with Tom's mother was one of a two- part series on Mercury 
>> Living Presence recordings in one of the two
>> UK publications "Classic Record Collector"  or "International  Classical Record Collector."  The 
>> two magazines are very similar in  content and
>> form factor.  I can't cite the specific issues because I ran out of  space for them about a year 
>> ago.  However, someone else on this group  may have them.  I'm fairly certain it was later than 
>> the the Summer  1998 "International Opera Collector" issue mentioned by Jon Conrad  that 
>> discussed the "Rigoletto" in question.
>>
>> In the same article, Ms. Cozart had negative commentary on the first  of the series, Cherubini's 
>> "Medea" with Maria Callas.  She indicated  that the recording
>> team didn't have enough preparation time in that case to set up  properly for a hall new to them 
>> (La Scala).  She did, however,  surprise me by commenting
>> that she thought EMI had done "a great job" of remastering it, my surprise being that any EMI CD 
>> issue I've heard of this recording  sounds like a pallid
>> shadow of either the original Mercury discs or the Mercury/Ampex open- reel tape issue.
>>
>>> The "Notes about the recording" in the original booklet make it  clear that the recording was 
>>> made at the Pergola.  Three microphones  were suspended in the hall and not moved during the 
>>> recording.  As  usual with Living Presence sessions, this was a three channel  recording.
>>>
>>
>> The notes in the booklet do make it clear, which is why I particularly noted Ms. Cozart's comment 
>> and was surprised by it.  The booklet notes  go into some
>> amount of detail of the Mercury truck going down small alleys to an  area under the Pergola on "a 
>> sunny day in July, 1960."
>>
>> By the way, I think Wilma Cozart is a truly great lady who really understands sound like few 
>> others.  The recording process used for the Mercury "Living
>> Presence" series was outstanding in its integrity and truthfulness of sound.  Those recordings 
>> remain unsurpassed.  It might sound simple to use only
>> three microphones for a stereo recording, but it's one of the hardest things you can do and you'd 
>> be hard pressed to find a recording  engineer today
>> with the ear and skill for how to position such a small number of  mikes effectively to capture 
>> the full orchestral, choral and vocal  forces involved in an opera
>> along with a good capture of the hall in which they were recorded.
>>
>> Once these microphones were placed, tests were recorded and levels set based on those.   There 
>> was no "gain riding" or compression applied,  at least to
>> the master tape.  The results are interesting for the sheer realism  and vitality of sound, but 
>> also for another reason:  they effectively  debash the notion that
>> singers have to be positioned so that they sound a city block away for the recording to reflect 
>> opera house reality.  In these recordings,  the voices are
>> clear, present and very "there."
>>
>> I think Ms. Cozart also effectively bebunked the thought that there is anything innately wrong 
>> with digital sound reproduction, and not just  DSD or high res,
>> but standard 16-bit, 44.1 KHz.  She did this with the series of  reissues of that Living Presence 
>> series on CD that was done in the  early 90's. These are
>> phenomenal sounding CD's.   To produce these reissues, Cozart had original tube-amplified tape 
>> decks fully restored.
>>
>> Interestingly, Wilma Cozart refused to allow CD reissues of the stereo recordings Mercury had 
>> made of the violinist Josef Szigeti.
>>
>>
>>> I think that Paley has also confused the Teatro della Pergola with another theatre, probably the 
>>> Communale?, in speaking of the venue  of the 1953 Serafin Lucia.
>>
>> I did confuse the two Florence theaters.
>>
>> And I would be very, very interested to hear if Tom Fine knows what became of the master tapes. 
>> If "ownership" reverted to Ricordi, did  they also get the
>> tapes?
>>
>> Max
>