As a former classicist, I'm always pleased to see Latin find a new niche in our records, but I wonder about this one. If "$c sculpsit" is OK, would headings like "James, $c illustrated by" also be OK, since it too is wording "that appears with the name"? At the same time, I'm reluctant to leave the use of qualifiers like "engraver" unconstrained, because they're too variable. We do need a reliable, neutral qualifier to use to distinguish a name heading when no approved qualifier is available (or at least, we do until a system of unique identifiers for persons frees us somehow from the need for unique name headings), but I don't think a supplied role designation is it. Stephen Gary L. Strawn wrote: > AACR2 22.19B1 instructs us to add to otherwise non-distinguished > surname headings "add a qualifier ...that appears with the name in > works by the person or in reference sources." It doesn't say that the > qualifier has to be a noun; it just has to appear with the name. -- Stephen Hearn Authority Control Coordinator/Head, Database Management Section Technical Services, University Libraries, University of Minnesota 160 Wilson Library 309 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 Ph: 612-625-2328 / Fax: 612-625-3428