I tend to agree. I usually try to follow an author's preference if it can be accommodated within AACR2. If their preference doesn't conform to any usage, I'll add it as a cross-reference, and explain that their work is now accessible on our catalogue under both forms. This usually seems to satisfy.
 
Regards
Richard
_________________________
Richard Moore
Authority Control Team Manager
The British Library
                                                                       
Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546806                               
E-mail: [log in to unmask]                           

 



From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hostage
Sent: 05 November 2008 18:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Form of Heading for a Thesis

I think there is a danger that this practice could be carried too far.  My feeling is that authors who care about how their names appear in catalogs should take care that they appear that way on their works.  I've never heard that author's preference "trumps all", though it can be used as a guide in some cases.  The principle of predominant usage is supposedly based on the idea that the heading will correspond to the form that users are likely to know.  Does it make sense if an author has published just one work (and most publish no more than one) and his heading doesn’t correspond to what's on the book?

 

___________________________________________________________

John Hostage                           Authorities Librarian

Langdell Hall                             [log in to unmask]

Harvard Law School Library    +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)

Cambridge, MA 02138             +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)

http://www.law.harvard.edu/library/

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amy H Turner
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Form of Heading for a Thesis

 


Thanks, Anthony, for the very lucid explanation.   I also remember the Dark Ages when the RI was first published.   At that time it was used to convert AACR1 headings, with the old rules' emphasis on the real, full name, to the revolutionary AACR2 standard of "commonly known."   Catalogers would scan through many titles published over a range of years.   Now, we are most frequently presented with the first work or just a handful of works by a new author.  Perhaps we should make more use of a rule of thumb that I remember only from informal communication with trainers, that the author's preference trumps all.  With Google and email, it is easier and easier to contact authors.   As many of us wrote in another thread, authors are usually happy to be consulted about how their name will appear in catalogs.   Below is an example of how contact with an author (initially just to determine his birth date) resulted in a fuller form than was on the title page of his one published work.  In other cases, such as Duke theses, we have used less full forms, based on the author's stated preference.

**************************************************************************
 
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
 
The British Library’s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2007/08 : www.bl.uk/knowledge
 
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
 
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
 
*************************************************************************
 
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
 
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
 
*************************************************************************