2.5C5 only applies if the illustrations are
all of one type: "If the publication consists wholly
or predominantly of illustrations, give all
ill. or chiefly ill.,
as appropriate. Optionally, if
those illustrations are all of one type, give all
[name of type] or chiefly [name of type]."
Since "ill.
(some col.)" isn't preceded by "all" or "chiefly" it's
possible the LCRI practice does not apply in this example, though I suspect
that there may be a number of situations where the cataloger has a 2.5C5
situation but isn't following the option instructions and preceding
["ill." or name of type] with "all" or "chiefly."
But my question is why catalogers [not just LC but PCC or otherwise], in those
situations where 2.5C5 does apply, never seem to use the Option, especially
since it is LC "practice" to "Apply the provisional option of
the rule." What's inhibiting the application of the option, even in
situations that seem to me to be relatively straightforward, such as an
all-cartoon collection?
Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 [log in to unmask]
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Amy H Turner
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008
6:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cartoons & 2.5C2
Evidently, LC considers "ill." to apply to
cartoons. Below is an example (one among many) from their catalog
"Illustrations" is quite generic. and IMHO appropriate.
100 |
1_ |a Trudeau,
G. B., |d 1948- |
240 |
10 |a Doonesbury. |k Selections |
245 |
10 |a Doonesbury
deluxe : |b selected glances
askance / |c G.B.Trudeau ;
introduction by Studs Terkel. |
250 |
__ |a 1st
ed. |
260 |
__ |a New
York : |b H. Holt, |c c1987. |
300 |
__ |a ca.
200 p. : |b ill. (some col.) ; |c 28 cm. |
"Arakawa,
Steven" <[log in to unmask]> 12/09/2008
06:14 PM
|
|
Maybe
it's the end of the day, but I can't seem to figure this out. AACR2 2.5C2 gives
the cataloger the option to use an appropriate illustration term if none of the
terms in the 2.5C2 option apply. The LCRI says it's LC practice to only use
"ill." and/or "maps" unless the book consists only or
chiefly of all illustrations of one type (2.5C5 option). So, why can't I find
any records that use "all cartoons" or "chiefly cartoons?"
There must be hundreds of books that fall into this category.
That I can't seem to find the term in LC's or
anyone else's cataloging makes me suspect that I'm overlooking something.
(For a training session, I thought it would be
neat to use "cartoons" as an example to demonstrate the part of the
rule that says appropriate terms other than the ones given in the 2.5C2 list
can be used.)
Anyway, if anyone has a suggestion I would be
grateful.
Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale
University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 [log in to unmask]