Print

Print


helpful experience: It wasn't oral history, but the week I got my H2,  
I was recording a software conference (16 roms at once!) when they  
asked us at the last minute toi record a round table meeting across  
the street. It was users sharing their experiences and the executives  
needed to hear it - I put the H2 in surround, locked the coltrols,  
handed it over and told them to put it in the middle of the table,  
bring it back when done. With 6 hours at 16/44.1 on a 4G chip, I was  
able to bring it into my laptop DAW. do some appropriate compression,  
and deliver the file an hour after the luncheon was over. It was nice  
stereo too, in two shannel but with surround micing. They wanted  
mono, so it was easy rto collapse to mono and deliver an MP3.

First piece of gear that paid for itself on its first use! I use a  
Sound Devices for music too, and the H2 is a perfect convenient unit  
for this use.

By the way, I also use it from the -10 line output of the SD deck to  
record MP3s simultaneously - can hand the musicians a preview copy  
right away. VERY handy.

<L>

Lou Judson  Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689


On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Hess wrote:

> Personally, I have a Sound Devices 722, but I use that for music  
> more than oral history. On the other hand, I'm coming close to  
> getting a Zoom H2. I now know some people who have one and I think  
> it makes sense for certain uses. My son wants to start recording  
> things he does and I'm considering getting one for my church as we  
> want to start podcasting sermons. I hear from my local music shop  
> that the H2 is selling like hotcakes and newspapers are giving them  
> to reporters, too.
>
> One thing for oral history interviews that I find attractive about  
> the H2 is that it can record in a quadraphonic mode that I would  
> think would be interesting for a round-table discussion. It has two  
> pairs of cardioid mics, front and back. Personally, I think stereo  
> enhances the oral history experience and the H2's quad is set up so  
> that it should sound reasonable out of a standard ITU 5.1  
> configuration (with only a phantom front centre).
>
> I know, this is not like me, but this interest was partially driven  
> by the church application and the tradeoff there is any dollar we  
> spend on technology is a dollar we don't spend on feeding the  
> homeless. In view of that, is the H2 adequate? I'm willing to buy  
> one soon to see. It's $259 CAD at the local music store--when they  
> get them back in stock.
>
> One of the people with really good ears who has one doesn't use it  
> for final music production, but he does use it to work through  
> ideas. Another professional sound restorer from New Zealand has one  
> and he says it's much better than a cassette.
>
> The H2 will take  higher capacity SD cards than the H4, as I read  
> the specs, and is cheaper. The connectors are not as good. Like  
> most things in life, it's a tradeoff.