Print

Print


My other concern about how / when to teach RDA is the issue of trying to have it coincide with when libraries will actually start using RDA - we don't know when it's really going to come out and in truth we don't know how affordable it will be (I expect for some it will NOT be affordable) - so if we teach our students RDA and then they go out to work and their library is not even using it that could be a problem.

Teaching a special class on it sounds very cool - or maybe it should be more covered in Advanced Cataloging?

Melodie Frances


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training on behalf of Arlene Taylor
Sent: Fri 1/9/2009 2:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [eduCAT] incorporating RDA into a Cataloging and Classification class (fwd)
 
Sorry!  I forgot my signature block on the message I just sent:
**************************************************
Arlene G. Taylor  **  Professor Emerita
Library & Information Science Program
School of Information Sciences
University of Pittsburgh  **  Pittsburgh, PA 15260
e-mail: [log in to unmask] 
http://www.pitt.edu/~agtaylor
**************************************************
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:02:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Arlene Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
To: Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata
     education & training <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [eduCAT] incorporating RDA into a Cataloging and Classification
     class

Going from AACR1 to AACR2 was overwhelming enough, but it was not like this is 
going to be.  It was more incremental.  We got "Chapter 6" first, which was the 
new description according to ISBD with the new punctuation, etc.  When AACR2 
came out, the description was pretty much the same as the "Chapter 6" that had 
been re-done for AACR1.  So teaching AACR2 then became a matter of dealing with 
the changes to formulating headings for names (personal, corporate, geographic) 
and uniform titles (especially for serials).  I wonder if there is any way to 
do RDA "incrementally"?

--Arlene

On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Frances, Melodie wrote:

> I have been wondering the exact same thing - my insitution wants me to 
> incorporate frbr into my class which is easy enough to do, but an entirely 
> new code (especially one that isn't even done yet) seems overwhelming - what 
> we have to cover is already more than one can do in a semester - adding this 
> seems insane - does anyone have experience with going from aacr1 to aacr2? I 
> also feel that SOMETHING needs to be said - maybe a one night lecture 
> comparing the two?
> 
> Thanks for asking this question - I have been floundering with it.
> 
> Melodie Frances
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & 
> training on behalf of Normore, Lorraine
> Sent: Fri 1/9/2009 12:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [eduCAT] incorporating RDA into a Cataloging and Classification 
> class
> 
> I've been thinking about what my incoming cataloging class needs to be
> told about RDA and how to incorporate RDA concepts into the class.  Last
> year, I provided some small amounts of information about the history and
> background for RDA but didn't try to have them explicitly explore
> cataloging issues under RDA (vs. cataloging under AACR2R).  I'm trying
> to figure out if I should go further, given the current state of RDA.
> I'd very much appreciate finding out what others are doing.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> 
> 
> Lorraine Normore
> 
> Assistant Professor
> 
> School of Information Sciences
> 
> University of Tennessee
> 
> 
> 
>