 |
 |
I find the following format works well for all 78s and LPs, too. For how the data responds to queries, see an older version of the data on DISMARC. Mike Gray *Combined* Number Date Initial Date Full Place Label Ensemble Conductor Composer Work 78 / 45 Issue 78 Prefix / Suffix 78 matrix LP Number CD Number Artists Artist sort Conductor1 Producer / Engineer Notes Additional Dates / Notes Victor number *58508* *1/22/1931* * * * * *Parlophone* * * * * *BACH, J.S.* *Partita No. 1 - Courante; Sarabande* * * * * *95597* * * * * *Jean Dennery, piano* * * * * * * * * * * * * Maurice Mengel wrote: > maybe you want to have a look at the Dublin Core-based Dismarc profile > (http://www.aitbiz.com/dismarc/ftpdata/manual/dmManual.r1v63.htm). > While not a complete solution, i find it aims for a useful compromise > between complexity and precision. And compliant with the OAI world. > > > ---------------------------------------------- > Maurice Mengel > Music Archive > Ethnological Museum > National Museums in Berlin > http://www.ilkar.de > --------------------------------------------- > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "D P Ingram" <[log in to unmask]> >> >>> Yep, certainly a lot more metadata is needed. >>> And that sadly varies over format too :( >>> >>> >> Also, keep in mind that there are at least TWO different forms >> of 78-related databases! The first is the "catalog," which lists >> the phonorecords in a collection...and thus refers to existing >> copies of phonorecords, and will include fields such as "Condition" >> and "Price Paid;" The second is the "discographic" database, >> which will aspire to list ALL the phonorecords on one or more >> specific labels (or of specific genres)! This latter does NOT refer >> to specific copies of phonorecords. Note that several examples >> of the former can be used in the compilation of the latter! >> >> Steven C. Barr >> >>