Keiko, all,
Thanks Keiko, it is good to see this report and make now of some
of their recommendations, see what they were thinking back then. It can frame
some of the things we have brought up in our discussion.
These link to the same thing, I think. This report must have contributed
to the “Core” document which SCS revised about a year ago, Guidelines
for Multiple Character Sets, (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/coreintro.html#9)
to bring it up-to-date with some current developments. As you know we are now
incorporating this and other PCC documentation.
thanks, Peter
From: Program for
Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Suzuki,
Keiko
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 6:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCTG1] Update on non-Latin document
Hi
Peter and all,
Sorry
for replying this late stage of Peter's drafting the preliminary report. It was
nice talking to some of you in the group in Chicago. Especially I thought it
was interesting discussion regarding the point Peter mentioned at the end of
the below message.
Related
to that, do you think we could get more background information about
"Non-Roman core record task group final report" (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/archive/jackphy.html),
which is one of the documents we need to review according to our charge (I only
have a draft charge dated on 7/3/2009) and I pointed out briefly at the
meeting? It is rather brief and seems published at the PCC website in January
2008 (but I also found it looks like almost entirely the same content of 1994
version in the OCLC CJK Users Group website: http://oclccjk.lib.uci.edu/corercd.htm???).
I am not much familiar with this one and I would like to know more although if
it was really originally done in 1994, the environment of our PCC setting might
be a bit different now an them.
-
Keiko
From: Program for
Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fletcher,
Peter
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCTG1] Update on non-Latin document
Hi
all, I assume everyone who went had an uneventful trip back home from Chicago.
Just
to let you know I am updating our document based on the comments on the
document (Google docs) and according to our work during our short meeting at
ALA. We need to get a preliminary draft done by the end of next week to submit
to standards committee. It will be incomplete, with the special languages
section 3 listed as “[under development]”, and the parts where
examples are needed, “[needs example]”, just like parts of the
RDA drafts some of were looking at months ago.
I’ll also write a brief
report of some of the concerns that arose during our discussion, especially
those dealing with our disagreement on the matter of whether or not non-Latin
script belongs in access points in bib records or rather in authority
record references.
Peter
Peter
Fletcher
Cyrillic
Catalog Librarian and Metadata Specialist
Office:
(310) 206-3927
Fax:
(310) 794-9357
UCLA
Cataloging & Metadata Center
11020
Kinross Avenue
Box
957230
Los
Angeles, CA 90095-7230