Print

Print


 Hi Marie,


Fiol backed stickies the best.
Make sure you get it RIGHT FIRST TIME!!!!


Happy Chrismaka to all at RNZ



Paul Turney
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message (including any attachments)
is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
confidential and privileged information

Sirensound Digital UK
Somerford House
22 Somerford Road
Cirencester
 ++44 (0) 1285 642289 
Sirensound Digital UK

-----Original Message-----
From: Marie O'Connell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] RFID

I was planning on using archival foil backed labels. Opinions here?MarieOn Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Pekka Gronowwrote:> Hi Marie,>> Your decision to use bar codes in this cases seems well founded. However,> my some types seem to fade spontaneously over a longer period, depending on> the type of paper and ink used. In your case, you don't want to replace> them every ten years. We learned this the hard way...>> Pekka>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marie O'Connell" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 11:14 AM> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] RFID>>>> Thank you>>>> We are not a library, we are a broadcasting sound archive. Most, and I>> mean most, of our items may get pulled out once in 10 or 12 years, or>> never>> (depending on anniversaries, etc). My gut instinct is to use barcodes,>> because we can do that for virtually no investment and maintain our>> accession number, which has been the whole purpose of this exercise,>> re-numbering artifacts that have no meaningful number when we go to>> preserve>> it. Plus, the only people handling these are archivists, and not>> patrons/normal humans (hehe), so I would trust the barcode would remain>> intact for a long time.>>>> I looked at the Wiki page and found it kinda useful.>>>> Will keep you posted as to what we do.>>>> Cheers>> Marie>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Corey Bailey  wrote:>>>> Hi Marie>>> I'm not sure how much research you have put into RFID yet but Wikipedia>>> will at least give you some idea:>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio-frequency_identification>>>>>> For archival storage you would have to consider passive RFID because the>>> active versions require a battery. To my knowledge, there is no evidence>>> of>>> RFID chips having any affect on nearby magnetic media. The chips are>>> being>>> implanted in credit cards and passports for example which have adjacent>>> magnetic stripes. The RF power generated by even the high output active>>> RFID>>> chips is so low that it's hard to imagine how they would affect the>>> coercivity of pre recorded audio tape. Video tape (I would think) with>>> it's>>> very high coercivity would be out of the question.>>>>>> You would be using passive RFID that would only be read (energized or>>> resonated if you will) once or twice a year for inventory purposes. I>>> can't>>> imagine their being a problem for long term storage.>>>>>> I suspect that your biggest consideration at this point would be cost.>>> The>>> technology may not be cost effective unless you have tens of thousands of>>> units to inventory.>>>>>> My greatest concern would be backwards compatibility. If you implement>>> RFID>>> 4.0 today will it be readable in 25 years by RFID 10.2.1? For the>>> present, I>>> wouldn't abandon your barcode system and look into the possible addition>>> of>>> RFID.>>>>>> I'm still a fan of the old fashioned printed label on the binder or>>> somewhere else in addition to whatever computerized system that's in>>> place.>>> It only takes one data entry error and then........>>>>>> Keep us posted!>>>>>> Cheers!>>>>>> Corey Bailey>>>>>>>>>>>> At 07:37 PM 12/13/2009, you wrote:>>>>>> Hi all>>>>>>>> We need to renumber some of our older accessions and have been>>>> considering>>>> barcodes with the accession number included. It was suggested to me>>>> today>>>> that we could be using RFID (radio frequency ID). As I know virtually>>>> nothing about them I have an uneasy feeling about applying this>>>> technology>>>> to magnetic tape boxes and reels.>>>>>>>> Does any audio visual archive use this technology on its tape boxes>>>> and/or>>>> reels?>>>> Is there any danger to the magnetic tape itself, considering both the>>>> box>>>> and reel would need the same identifier?>>>> Can the actual accession number be put on these so as to be seen>>>> visibly?>>>>>>>> Any thoughts would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.>>>>>>>> Cheers>>>>>>>> Marie>>>>>>>>>>>>>