Print

Print


I have every  release of Enhanced Audio DC3 to DC7... and i still get mixed results... it has a tendency  to over process  the noise reduction and the click/pop filter leaves much  to desired  to my taste.
I have been using the Click repair and noise repair downloaded on line from Brian Davies.  The click/crackle filters are  awesome for 78s and  lps. 
His noise reduction can be almost transparent when you  learn how to sample and contour the reduction curve to individual discs.
Ive gotten excellent results with as little as 6-9 db of reduction and didnt  notice  the severe loss oh highs ive had with DC 7.
I think each  has something to offer...  DC7 has more effects and whistles and bells  which i find useful..... both software applications are handy to have on your computer.
dnelson 

--- On Sun, 1/17/10, Jan Myren <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Jan Myren <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] Adding reverb to old 78's
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Sunday, January 17, 2010, 3:36 PM
> HI!
> 
> This post have not been sent before!
> 
> Regards
> jan
> 
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> P� vegne av Jan Myren
> Sendt: 17. januar 2010 23:54
> Til: [log in to unmask]
> Emne: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] Adding
> reverb to old 78's
> 
> HI!
> 
> What do you think of Diamond Cut DC7 software for restoring
> old 78's?
> 
> Regards
> jan
> 
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> P� vegne av Lou Judson
> Sendt: 17. januar 2010 23:36
> Til: [log in to unmask]
> Emne: Re: [ARSCLIST] SV: [ARSCLIST] Adding reverb to old
> 78's
> 
> Here's a dos cetanvos response - I find SoundSoap can be
> destructive� 
> if used in amounts that are effective - inother words,
> close to useless.
> 
> I have Izotope RX and find it can be remarkably effective,
> but again� 
> as with all noise redution, moderation is essential. You
> can reduce� 
> noise only up to the point where it begins to detract from
> the� 
> desired sounds. And often multiple gentle passes will be
> more� 
> effective than one severe application. Almost always you
> want to back� 
> off from the initial settings, in my experience.
> 
> I just used RX on a beautiful live recording I did last
> week to� 
> remove the sound of the hall's lights humming and the AC
> whooshing.� 
> It can be stunningly effective - in moderation!
> 
> Knowing where to stop is part of the art and the vital part
> of good� 
> ears in the entire process. It's a bit like knowing when
> the playback� 
> is "good enough" and when it is just showing the warts in
> the old� 
> media...
> 
> I'd rather hear some surfece noise than a dull
> overprocessed transfer!
> 
> <L>
> 
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Rapha�l Parejo-Coudert
> wrote:
> 
> > I'm actually working on restoration of three old
> shellac records of
> > Navarra Jotas (the first recording of jotas) and I
> have a lot of
> > problems. A lot of the "noise" have the same
> frequences ranges that� 
> > the
> > voices.
> >
> > I would very grateful to Harry explain us what
> "computer application
> > that can actually detect what is music and what is
> surface noise and
> > completely delete the latter without touching the
> former" ?
> >
> > I've tried with Bias SoundSoap Pro 2 denoiser, and
> also iZotope
> > restoration suite. And I have medium results.
> >
> > Thank you for your help and answers.
>