I raised this issue at the MARBI meeting in Boston. NetDev agreed to take appropriate action. John Attig Penn State Univ. [log in to unmask] At 06:54 PM 2/1/2010, Culbertson, Rebecca wrote: >Colleagues-- > >At the present time the 040 subfield "e" is not repeatable. Therefore >what is likely to happen when more than one description convention needs >to be used--e.g., both "rda" and "dcrmb" are applicable? > >Is it more likely that the subfield will become repeatable? Or that >there will need to be another convention, such as "dcrmbrda" > > >Rebecca Culbertson > >Shared Cataloging Program >California Digital Library >Metadata Services Department >University of California, San Diego >La Jolla, California 92093-0175 >(858) 822-6415 (Phone) >(858) 822-0349 (Fax) >"If at first you don't succeed, change the rules"