Print

Print


I raised this issue at the MARBI meeting in Boston.  NetDev agreed to 
take appropriate action.

         John Attig
         Penn State Univ.
         [log in to unmask]

At 06:54 PM 2/1/2010, Culbertson, Rebecca wrote:
>Colleagues--
>
>At the present time the 040 subfield "e" is not repeatable.  Therefore
>what is likely to happen when more than one description convention needs
>to be used--e.g., both "rda" and "dcrmb" are applicable?
>
>Is it more likely that the subfield will become repeatable?  Or that
>there will need to be another convention, such as "dcrmbrda"
>
>
>Rebecca Culbertson
>
>Shared Cataloging Program
>California Digital Library
>Metadata Services Department
>University of California, San Diego
>La Jolla, California 92093-0175
>(858) 822-6415 (Phone)
>(858) 822-0349 (Fax)
>"If at first you don't succeed, change the rules"