Print

Print


Again, I agree with all of Robert's changes and offer an additional point:

Paragraph beginning "Rationale for Mandatory if applicable (MA) fields":  delete the word "all" (there are other descriptive elements that could be transcribed from the item that aren't MA).

Dave

>>> Robert Rendall <[log in to unmask]> 3/22/2010 2:39 PM >>>
I've attached a copy with a few tracked changes.

I'm personally fine with saying that adding non-Latin headings enhances 
access.  But given that two of us have now expressed reservations, 
should we tone down the earlier part of this report where we say "the 
task force favors encouraging the addition of original-script headings 
in bibliographic records"??

Robert.

Fletcher, Peter wrote:
>
> All, I attached the latest draft of the report that will accompany the 
> guidelines when we submit them next week.
>
>  
>
> I know you all out there on the East Coast are all gone home by now. 
> Hope you had a good weekend.
>
>  
>
> Peter
>
>  
>
> Peter Fletcher
>
> Cyrillic Catalog Librarian and Metadata Specialist
>
> [log in to unmask] 
>
> Office: (310) 206-3927
>
> Fax: (310) 794-9357
>
> UCLA Cataloging & Metadata Center
>
> 11020 Kinross Avenue
>
> Box 957230
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230
>
>  
>
>  
>