> This could be different from what is under discussion here, but I've
> seen "false levels" at multiple institutions while cleaning up batches
> of EADs. As far as I can tell, the main reason component padding has
> been done historically is for display purposes. Some processors in the
> past may not have understoond CSS or didn't have access to the finding
> aid CSS files.

For us, it was not a matter of CSS padding, it was problems that occurred
during XSL transformation.  The XSLT we were using was a tweaked EAD
cookbook stylesheet that couldn't handle a collection that had series with
sub-series and series without sub-series.   For example, we were working
with many collections intellectually structured like:

c01     Series: Vessel Papers

         c02     Sub-Series: M/V "O.K. Service X"

                c03      File: Manifests

                c03      File: Captain's Logs

c01    Series: Financial Records

        c02      File: General Ledger

        c02      File: Annual Reports

As I understood the problem, the XSLT we were using was not testing
individual components to see if the attribute was series, sub-series, file,
etc.  It thought all c02s were sub-series and would not correctly transform
c02s that were files.  That might be a simple fix, but it was beyond our
XSLT knowledge.  In the absence of a dedicated XSLT person to write the XSL
test for us, we added "false" c02 layers to our series that did not contain
sub-series so all files would be encoded as c03s.  We then uploaded static
HTML files into the university's content management system, which controlled
all the CSS.

It was less than ideal, but it got the job done.  I am especially interested
in Ethan's comment about just  using <c> and @level.  Is anyone else doing