Yes, I could do that. I think, however, that we are causing needless
confusion by insisting that a middle initial is not a primary element.
Sometimes it makes all the difference in being able to identify which James
Benjamin you actually have--and clearly LC did not recognize it when they
created the later record.

I try to train my staff to look at all the different names before they
create a new authority record, but it can be very time consuming to look at
each and every Harry Smith to see if your Harry X. Smith is one of the ones
already established with a date but no middle initial. How much easier if
the first person just adds a cross reference!


On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Adam L. Schiff
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I would move the 670 to the record you're going to keep, but not add any
> 400 at all, because the primary elements are not any different between the
> two.  However, if it's clear from usage that the author has "changed" his
> name or that a different form of name is now predominant, you could feel
> free to change the heading itself.
> Looking in OCLC I see:
> Usage for James Benjamin: 1 title from 1987
> Usage for James J. Benjamin, Jr.: 3 (or possibly 4 depending on how you
> count) titles, from 2008-2009
> This indicates to me both a change in the author's preference and that the
> later form is also predominant, so I think you could apply 22.2A1 and
> revised the heading itself to:
> Benjamin, James J., $d 1965-
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Adam L. Schiff
> Principal Cataloger
> University of Washington Libraries
> Box 352900
> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
> (206) 543-8409
> (206) 685-8782 fax
> [log in to unmask]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Kathy Winzer wrote:
>  Colleagues,
>> We avoid adding cross references when the element in question is not the
>> first one to the right of the comma. When an author uses his middle
>> initial,
>> where he previously did not, we do not provide a reference. I have in hand
>> two name authority records for the same person that I think resulted from
>> this practice.
>> When cataloging In pursuit of justice by Richard B. Zabel and James J.
>> Benjamin, Jr., the cataloger did not notice that n86002004 Benjamin,
>> James,
>> 1965- included a 670 for the CIP t.p. (James J. Benjamin, Jr.) and created
>> n
>> 2008056697 for that form of name. Since the title page of the original
>> title
>> dropped the middle initial, the cataloger creating the first record
>> dropped
>> it from the heading and did not provide a cross reference to the fuller
>> form
>> (since the difference was not the first element to the right of the
>> comma).
>> When I add information to the older record from the newer one, is it ok if
>> I
>> now add that fuller form? So a 400 for Benjamin, James J., 1965- ?  But
>> not
>> for the duplicate, Benjaman, James J., Jr.? I would like to avoid a repeat
>> of the duplication next time Mr. Benjamin changes his mind about how his
>> name should appear, but I am not always sure of how many cross references
>> would be helpful.
>> Thanks for any advice,
>> Kathy
>> --
>> Kathleen M. Winzer
>> Catalog Librarian
>> Robert Crown Law Library
>> Stanford Law School
>> Stanford, CA 94305-8612
>> 650-723-0343 (voice)
>> 650-723-8657 (fax)

Kathleen M. Winzer
Catalog Librarian
Robert Crown Law Library
Stanford Law School
Stanford, CA 94305-8612
650-723-0343  fax: 650-723-8657