From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

Hi Lisa,

something good always comes from asking the list. I shall contribute a small 

Glass discs are always direct-cut and mostly one-offs. They first came out 
during WW2, but surprisingly also about 1951 when there was another material 
shortage, when glass was replacing aluminum as the carrier. The manufacturers 
actually considered them to be better lacquer discs, because the surface of 
the glass was much smoother then aluminum.

The major problem with lacquer discs is delamination or its precursors, 
cracks: the outer lacquer layer may separate from the glass base, and this 
makes the record unplayable. It is difficult to see any pattern in the 
appearance of the defects, because you will find lacquers that are stilll in 
perfect condition and some where certain constituents have crawled from the 
inside to the surface, where they form a soft layer that can be removed.

You said that you have ca. 6 cubic feet of them; with a square outline of ca 
one square foot this meens ca. 6 linear feet, and that is a lot, probably 
more than 600. I would expect them to be stored upright and not at an angle 
and not in piles of more than 4 inches. They should be kept dust free. The 
records themselves are surprisingly strong, but obviously the surfaces are 

There are people on this list who are not in Europe and who work with such 
records very frequently, and no doubt they will respond further.

Kind regards,


P.S. You did not mean record albums by Philip Glass, I presume?!

Lisa Lobdell wrote:

> Hi, I'm brand new to this list and was completely ignorant of the 
> existence of glass albums until last week when I accepted an internship 
> to inventory the collection of a small foundation.  Along with the 
> written documents and LP's in this collection are approximately 6cft of 
> glass albums.  I have no idea yet what the quality of these albums is, 
> but I would appreciate it if someone could give me a quick rundown of 
> what defects to look for and how to preserve them.  I've read some of 
> the threads, but I'm brand new to archiving audio materials so I'm a bit 
> confused.
> Thanks,
> Lisa Lobdell