I would like to wait until Monday when Europeans and catalogers in Asian countries will get back to work and read our discussions taking place on Friday. I am interested in their reactions to what the RDA testers are pushing through OCLC under disguise of the RDA test.
 

Wojciech Siemaszkiewicz

New York Public Library
Library Services Center
31-11 Thompson Ave.
Long Island City, N.Y. 11101
(917) 229-9603
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

-----Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> wrote: -----

To: [log in to unmask]
From: Mark Ehlert <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 10/29/2010 07:54PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Using existing NARs

Kevin M. Randall <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> As I understand it, the North American (U.S. only?)
> community is the only place that is in such an uproar.  I think it's really
> in our best interest to take the test as seriously as possible and gain as
> much from it as we can.

According to one presentation I read[1], a number of European
countries are waiting for the results of the U.S. test--and
translations of RDA--before making any kind of move.  Another
presentation has some information on RDA implementation by non-U.S.
Anglo libraries[2].

[1] "RDA in Europe: making it happen : summary of presentations by
European countries on plans for moving to RDA" at
<http://www.slainte.org.uk/eurig/meetings.htm>.

[2] "RDA and plans: Australia, Canada, UK, & US" at the same site.

--
Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
Bibliographic & Technical      15 Andersen Library
  Services (BATS) Unit        222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
<http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>