 |
 |
All, I'm broadening the previous topic a bit because our local system just failed to load some updated geographic authority records... Michigan, North Carolina, etc. because of a new linking field in the authority format. I looked at the MARC documentation but I do not see a practical use for the 751 so I'm wondering why I should bother with all the work of now manually replacing these records. I'm also wondering why I haven't seen discussion. If there is a practical reason, would someone share that with me? Point me to discussion? Thanks, Mary Charles -----Original Message----- From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 4:38 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Completion of the work of PCC SCS Non-Latin Script Cataloging Documentation TF This was discussed in May at the BIBCO and CONSER Operations Committees meeting. I raised a number of concerns about all the options and the implications for authority records and particularly for those of us who are using network level catalogs like WorldCat Local.