 |
 |
Can you link to the thread in the archives of the list, or is it (like most of our lists, for no good reason) private? I am curious what the arguments against it are. It seems like a good idea to me? But I do not use Scan at all. I do not use facetting through SRU at all, but if/when I do, I believe I'd use displayTerm if it was there. LeVan,Ralph wrote: > There’s an overlong debate going on in the search-ws-comment mail list ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>) about including a displayTerm as a subelement of <term> in a facet response. The feelings against including displayTerm are so strong as to suggest that it should be deprecated in Scan. > > I’ve been the one arguing for the inclusion of displayTerm for consistency with Scan, but I don’t use it myself in any of my implementations. So, my question for you all is: do any of you actually use the displayTerm in your responses? If not, I’ll happily drop my arguments. If so, can you provide a good use case? > > Thanks! > > Ralph > >