Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
Pretty much all the conversation on that list has been about changes to the facet response and the only controversial change is my desire to add a displayTerm. Here's a pointer to the achive for this month: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/search-ws-comment/201010/threads.ht ml Ralph > -----Original Message----- > From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:50 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: <displayTerm> as a subelement of <term> in Scan responses > > Can you link to the thread in the archives of the list, or is it (like > most of our lists, for no good reason) private? > > I am curious what the arguments against it are. It seems like a good > idea to me? > > But I do not use Scan at all. > > I do not use facetting through SRU at all, but if/when I do, I believe > I'd use displayTerm if it was there. > > LeVan,Ralph wrote: > > There's an overlong debate going on in the search-ws-comment mail list > ([log in to unmask]<mailto:search-ws- > [log in to unmask]>) about including a displayTerm as a > subelement of <term> in a facet response. The feelings against including > displayTerm are so strong as to suggest that it should be deprecated in Scan. > > > > I've been the one arguing for the inclusion of displayTerm for consistency with > Scan, but I don't use it myself in any of my implementations. So, my question for > you all is: do any of you actually use the displayTerm in your responses? If not, > I'll happily drop my arguments. If so, can you provide a good use case? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Ralph > > > >