On behalf of the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee, I'm reposting this message to add the wording "Therefore, with the exception of some serial and integrating resource records," at the beginning of the last sentence in the third paragraph.  This exception is present in the OCLC policy statement cited in the second paragraph and should have been included in the summary statement at the end of the third paragraph.


Judy Kuhagen

Policy and Standards Division

Library of Congress


= = = = = =


To: [various email lists -- please excuse duplication]

From: the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee

Subj:  US RDA Test and OCLC

The US RDA Test Coordinating Committee wishes to clarify the role of OCLC in the US RDA test, and to provide information and communication pathways to those who are not test participants.

OCLC is playing a critical role in the US RDA test. They have enabled the testers to create non-distributed institutional records for the common sets of test records and have worked closely with the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee and the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) to develop interim procedures and policies to minimize the impact of this test on OCLC users.  http://www.oclc.org/us/en/rda/policy.htm

OCLC has tens of thousands of members around the world, some of whom may have implemented RDA immediately when it was released.  Duplicate records are a concern for many OCLC members, and creating parallel AACR2 and RDA records for the same title would only exacerbate the problem of duplicate records and would be likely to be merged by OCLC’s Duplicate Detection and Resolution (DDR) software.  Therefore, with the exception of some serial and integrating resource records, OCLC’s interim policy during the testing period is that neither test participants nor other OCLC members should convert OCLC master records from AACR2 to RDA or vice versa. 

Likewise, in the authority file, OCLC and PCC policy is that no duplicate authority records will be created.  See http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/RDAtest/admindoc1.doc for more information.  Existing authority records (based on AACR2 or earlier rules) may be temporarily augmented with a 7XX for the corresponding RDA form of the authorized access point, and new RDA authority records may be created.  After the implementation decision, authority records with 7XX field will be updated as needed. 

Institutions may need to adjust local procedures to account for RDA bibliographic and authority records your staff may encounter during the testing period.

An online survey to provide information to the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee from informal testers and others is available at:  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Q5968DB

RDA records created may be submitted to the Library of Congress.  Contact Dave Reser ([log in to unmask])

Questions or comments about the US RDA test may be sent to the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee via Susan Morris at the Library of Congress ([log in to unmask])

Questions or comments about the content of RDA may be emailed to [log in to unmask]

Questions about the RDA Toolkit may be directed to ALA Editions at http://access.rdatoolkit.org/

Additional information about the US RDA test is available at the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee’s website: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/ 

A FAQ and further explanation of the test process is available here: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/RDAtest/admindoc9.doc