+1, though *after* we have come to a full consensus about the *concepts* we are trying to represent. Trying to write a grammar for concepts that are not genuinely and thoroughly agreed seems to me a recipe for a lot of time-wasting.


On 24 November 2010 16:52, Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jakob Voss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


> P.S: We definitely need to define a formal grammar (e.g. in Backus-Naur
> Syntax) for extended date/time notation.



Simon Grant
+44 7710031657