Print

Print


 From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
 
>  205 Year and ordinal day.  Why is this needed?  If the requirement is
> to record a particular date, that date can be recorded in yyyy-mm-dd
> form, no?  When does the requirement arise to record it in ordinal
> form?
> 
>  207 Week date.  Same question; when and why is it a requirement to
> record a date using this notation rather than the yyyy-mm-dd notation?

It's been my intention to take some of these questionable "requirements" and
challenge them before the spec is finalized (i.e. before the end of this
phase).  I can't cite a use case for either of these two. Can anyone?

And if there are others you would like to list that would be useful.

--Ray