 |
 |
From Edward C. Zimmermann > There should be a preference for neither. The point of +/- was to avoid > the discussion. Yes, I think it is safe to remove BC from the spec altogether and avoid any further debate over this. There had been a requirement expressed for BC dates but since we are expressing the numerical equvalent, I think it is safe to say that we satisfy that requirement. I'll simply remove all references to BC. --Ray