I respectfully disagree. When people change their names the heading should reflect that form. File maintenance is a fact of life, and should not be feared.

Chuck H.

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hostage
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Leslie Marmon Silko

Certainly, if the name were being established now for the first time, it would be based on the fuller form.  But this is not a name change for cataloging purposes.  It's a difference in the fullness of name.  The original question asked for the rule showing why the heading hadn't been changed.  The rule is probably meant to prevent headings from being constantly reconsidered, with all the file maintenance that would ensue.

John Hostage                  Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian
Langdell Hall                 [log in to unmask]
Harvard Law School Library    +(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
Cambridge, MA 02138           +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)

> -----Original Message-----
>      I believe the heading should be changed if it reflects the
> current, as well as predominant, usage of the author. The 2nd-3rd 670s
> certainly imply a name change.

This email message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by anyone other than the intended individual or entity is prohibited without prior approval.  If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately.