Print

Print


Nathan,

To address your followup question, it is implied that if you use
"otherlevel" as a value for the level attribute, you're going to define what
that other level is.  Otherwise, what's the point?  The other level could be
anything.  You'd also want to create a list of values that are valid for the
otherlevel attribute so you're at least consistent within and between your
own finding aids.

That said, I agree with Mike--since EAD provides a hierarchy through the
various component levels, a sub*-subseries is just the next level down from
wherever you're at (* being a wild card for however many sub-s there are).

Kris

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nathan Tallman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Mike,
>
> I hear you.  But, I don't think I explained my self very well.
>
> The way I was taught, you don't specify the otherlevel attribute when using
> level="otherlevel", it just left at that.  No mater where it is in the
> hierarchy.
>
> For example:
>
> <co1 level="series>....
> <co2 level="subseries>....
> <c03 level="otherlevel">...
>
> or
>
> <co1 level="series>....
> <co2 level="subseries>....
> <c03 level="otherlevel">...
> <c04 level="otherlevel">....
>
> In other words, the placement within the hierarchy is indicated by the
> numbered component, not the otherlevel attribute.  So, no extra encoding
> work.  I know that not everyone uses numbered components, so it might not
> work for all.  I'm not trying to be argumentative, I just want to make sure
> I am encoding things correctly!
>
> Gmail is telling me that Barbara has an update, let me see what she says...
>  Ah, I see she uses the otherlevel attribute.  Perhaps I should start using
> it...  I agree with Barbara that both are probably acceptable, as long as
> you know the affect on your stylesheets.  EAD was designed to be flexible
> after all.
>
> So here's my follow up question:  If I'm using level="otherlevel", should I
> also be using the otherlevel attribute and not relying on numbered
> components?
>
> Thanks!
> Nathan
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Michael Rush <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Nathan,
>>
>> That level of specificity in the level attribute adds too much
>> complexity to the markup.  What is a sub-subseries if it isn't a <c
>> level="subseries"> within a <c level="subseries">?  By encoding <c
>> level="otherlevel" otherlevel="sub-subseries"> you use two attributes
>> where you could use one and don't gain any semantic meaning.  What if
>> you have a third subseries?  Do you encode <c level="otherlevel"
>> otherlevel="sub-sub-subseries">?  Where does it end?
>>
>> Encoding <c level="otherlevel" otherlevel="sub-subseries"> creates two
>> thing - more encoding work and the need for a more complicated
>> stylesheet - neither of which I like.  Since I can't see what you gain
>> by it, I argue for sticking with @level="subseries".
>>
>> This is not to say there aren't times to use @otherlevel - we often
>> use @otherlevel="accession" - I just don't think there's any reason to
>> specify sub-sub-sub-sub-subseries when you can easily identify them as
>> such given the encoding context.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Nathan Tallman <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> > Mike,
>> > When I was trained on EAD, I was instructed to use level="otherlevel"
>> for
>> > sub-subseries.  May I ask why you don't recommend this approach?
>> > Thanks!
>> > Nathan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Michael Rush <[log in to unmask]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Christine,
>> >>
>> >> I don't recommend that approach.  I when I have sub-subseries, I just
>> >> encode them with level="subseries".  Keep it simple, as always.  If
>> >> for some reason you need to identify the actual sub-subseries - in a
>> >> stylesheet for example - it's a simple xpath: *[@level='subseries' and
>> >> parent::*[@level='subseries']].
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:53 AM, De Catanzaro, Christine D
>> >> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi everyone,
>> >> >
>> >> > This is hopefully a rather straightforward question for the list: For
>> a
>> >> > collection with sub-subseries, when entering the level, would the
>> correct
>> >> > attribute for level be "otherlevel" and then to specify the level
>> would it
>> >> > be "sub-subseries" (with the hyphen)?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Christine
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Christine D. de Catanzaro, Ph.D., M.L.I.S.
>> >> > Access Archivist
>> >> > Subject Librarian - Music
>> >> >
>> >> > Georgia Tech Archives
>> >> > Library and Information Center
>> >> > 704 Cherry Street
>> >> > Atlanta, GA 30332-0900
>> >> >
>> >> > Phone: 404-385-0107
>> >> > Fax: 404-894-9421
>> >> >
>> >> > E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>


-- 
Kris Kiesling
Elmer L. Andersen Director of Archives and Special Collections
305 Andersen Library
University of Minnesota
222 21st Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN  55455
voice: 612-626-5776
fax: 612-625-5525