On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Ray Denenberg
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The discussion of year 30,000 is pointless.  We are representing years
> beyond 9999.  Are you suggesting that we don't need to do that? --Ray

I was mostly joking :-)

But more seriously, I don't care, so long as we don't cause problems
elsewhere (given that years are four digit in the ISO spec).