Dear Colleagues,

 

Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote.

I agree with the modification of the name in French.

 

Best regards

Christian

 

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee,

 

Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer.

 

But: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French.

 

My proposal is that we don’t do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed
FROM “tetum”
TO “tétoum; tetum”.

 

Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?

 

Best regards,
Håvard

 

--------------------

Håvard Hjulstad

  (prosjektleder / Project Manager)

  Standard Norge / Standards Norway

  [log in to unmask]

------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CBFC92.08D1E7F0-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:49:04 -0400 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: "Patton,Glenn" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name In-Reply-To: A<004c01cbfc81$454917f0$cfdb47d0$@[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBFDC7.0001A2BB" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFDC7.0001A2BB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree also. --Glenn From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [ISOJAC] Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear Colleagues, Håvard's suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote. I agree with the modification of the name in French. Best regards Christian From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee, Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main "problem" seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer. But: The request uses the French form "tétoum", while our database has the French form "tetum" only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as "tetun"), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French. My proposal is that we don't do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed FROM "tetum" TO "tétoum; tetum". Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot? Best regards, Håvard -------------------- Håvard Hjulstad (prosjektleder / Project Manager) Standard Norge / Standards Norway [log in to unmask] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFDC7.0001A2BB Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree also.

 

--Glenn

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ISOJAC] Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote.

I agree with the modification of the name in French.

 

Best regards

Christian

 

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee,

 

Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer.

 

But: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French.

 

My proposal is that we don’t do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed
FROM “tetum”
TO “tétoum; tetum”.

 

Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?

 

Best regards,
Håvard

 

--------------------

Håvard Hjulstad

  (prosjektleder / Project Manager)

  Standard Norge / Standards Norway

  [log in to unmask]

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFDC7.0001A2BB-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:54:12 -0400 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: "Guenther, Rebecca" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name In-Reply-To: <004c01cbfc81$454917f0$cfdb47d0$@[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_73E50E886286FC46AB65DBE1954443951A956BA0E1LCXCLMB03LCDS_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_73E50E886286FC46AB65DBE1954443951A956BA0E1LCXCLMB03LCDS_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list. Rebecca ________________________________ From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear Colleagues, Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote. I agree with the modification of the name in French. Best regards Christian From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee, Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer. But: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French. My proposal is that we don’t do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed FROM “tetum” TO “tétoum; tetum”. Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot? Best regards, Håvard -------------------- Håvard Hjulstad (prosjektleder / Project Manager) Standard Norge / Standards Norway [log in to unmask] --_000_73E50E886286FC46AB65DBE1954443951A956BA0E1LCXCLMB03LCDS_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list.
 
Rebecca
From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote.

I agree with the modification of the name in French.

 

Best regards

Christian

 

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee,

 

Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer.

 

But: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French.

 

My proposal is that we don’t do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed
FROM “tetum”
TO “tétoum; tetum”.

 

Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?

 

Best regards,
Håvard

 

--------------------

Håvard Hjulstad

  (prosjektleder / Project Manager)

  Standard Norge / Standards Norway

  [log in to unmask]

--_000_73E50E886286FC46AB65DBE1954443951A956BA0E1LCXCLMB03LCDS_-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:42:41 +0000 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: "Stewart, Margaret" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_573F23759C5CC04C9F6536FC6BA482D6029DFEv41exmbx01lacbaci_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_573F23759C5CC04C9F6536FC6BA482D6029DFEv41exmbx01lacbaci_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree as well. Margaret From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guenther, Rebecca Sent: April-18-11 10:54 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list. Rebecca ________________________________ From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear Colleagues, Håvard's suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote. I agree with the modification of the name in French. Best regards Christian From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Tetum, tet - French name Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee, Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main "problem" seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer. But: The request uses the French form "tétoum", while our database has the French form "tetum" only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as "tetun"), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French. My proposal is that we don't do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed FROM "tetum" TO "tétoum; tetum". Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot? Best regards, Håvard -------------------- Håvard Hjulstad (prosjektleder / Project Manager) Standard Norge / Standards Norway [log in to unmask] --_000_573F23759C5CC04C9F6536FC6BA482D6029DFEv41exmbx01lacbaci_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree as well.

 

Margaret

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guenther, Rebecca
Sent: April-18-11 10:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list.

 

Rebecca

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a formal vote.

I agree with the modification of the name in French.

 

Best regards

Christian

 

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Håvard Hjulstad
Sent: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Tetum, tet - French name

 

Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee,

 

Below is a request relating to the language Tetum (alpha-3 identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: tet). The main request was for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer.

 

But: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in English and French.

 

My proposal is that we don’t do anything with the English name, but that the French name is changed
FROM “tetum”
TO “tétoum; tetum”.

 

Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?

 

Best regards,
Håvard

 

--------------------

Håvard Hjulstad

  (prosjektleder / Project Manager)

  Standard Norge / Standards Norway

  [log in to unmask]

--_000_573F23759C5CC04C9F6536FC6BA482D6029DFEv41exmbx01lacbaci_-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:24:19 +0100 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> Subject: 639-1 In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Should ISO 639-1 be formally stabilized? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:57:15 +0200 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Francois Demay <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 639-1 In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundarye6ba5bbb1d56576f04a136ccbd --90e6ba5bbb1d56576f04a136ccbd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In a way IT IS stabilized. see below http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639-1 *New ISO 639-1 codes are not added if an ISO 639-2code exists, so systems that use ISO 639-1 and 639-2 codes, with 639-1 codes preferred, do not have to change existing codes.[1] * If an ISO 639-2 code that covers a group of languages is used, it might be overridden for some specific languages by a new ISO 639-1 code. ISO 639-1 codes added after RFC publication in January 2001 ISO 639-1 ISO 639-2 Name Date added Previously covered by io ido Ido 2002-01-15 art wa wln Wallon 2002-01-29 roa li lim Limburgish 2002-08-02 gem ii iii Sichuan Yi 2002-10-14 sit an arg Aragonese 2002-12-23 roa ht hat Haitian Creole 2003-02-26 cpfI am not sure this was the best way to solve the problem... In ISO 3166-1 each country or dependent entity has BOTH an alpha-2 and an alpha-3 code point. In some cases it can be useful to use one and some cases to use the other one. It seems (from the request that originated this discussion) that it may be the same for official (or administrative) languages of indenpendant countries. If in ISO 639 things are frozen until the end of the world then...we'll have to wait for a long time ! Best regards FD 2011/4/18 Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> > Should ISO 639-1 be formally stabilized? > > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ > --90e6ba5bbb1d56576f04a136ccbd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a way IT IS stabilized.

see below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639-1

New ISO 639-1 codes are not added if an ISO 639-2 code exists, so systems that use ISO 639-1 and 639-2 codes, with 639-1 codes preferred, do not have to change existing codes.[1]

If an ISO 639-2 code that covers a group of languages is used, it might be overridden for some specific languages by a new ISO 639-1 code.

ISO 639-1 codes added after RFC publication in January 2001
ISO 639-1 ISO 639-2 Name Date added Previously covered by
io ido Ido 2002-01-15 art
wa wln Wallon 2002-01-29 roa
li lim Limburgish 2002-08-02 gem
ii iii Sichuan Yi 2002-10-14 sit
an arg Aragonese 2002-12-23 roa
ht hat Haitian Creole 2003-02-26 cpf
I am not sure this was the best way to solve the problem...

In ISO 3166-1 each country or dependent entity has BOTH an alpha-2 and an alpha-3 code point.
In some cases it can be useful to use one and some cases to use the other one.

It seems (from the request that originated this discussion) that it may be the same for official (or administrative) languages of indenpendant countries.

If in ISO 639 things are frozen until the end of the world then...we'll have to wait for a long time !

Best regards

FD


2011/4/18 Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
Should ISO 639-1 be formally stabilized?

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

--90e6ba5bbb1d56576f04a136ccbd-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:42:02 +0200 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Christian Galinski <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 639-1 In-Reply-To: [log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01CBFE19.D6C0ACE0" This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CBFE19.D6C0ACE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Colleagues, I agree with François: ISO 639-1 - should not be increased without very stringent reasons, - may have to be modified, if necessary by a modification of a corresponding 3-letter symbol, - very unlikely, but may have to be modified for other reasons, and in that sense it is stabilized. Given the above-mentioned reasons, I have always been strictly against a once and for all total “freeze” of ISO 639-1. Best regards Christian From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Francois Demay Sent: Montag, 18. April 2011 21:57 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: 639-1 In a way IT IS stabilized. see below http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639-1 New ISO 639-1 codes are not added if an ISO 639-2 code exists, so systems that use ISO 639-1 and 639-2 codes, with 639-1 codes preferred, do not have to change existing codes.[1] If an ISO 639-2 code that covers a group of languages is used, it might be overridden for some specific languages by a new ISO 639-1 code. ISO 639-1 codes added after RFC publication in January 2001 ISO 639-1 ISO 639-2 Name Date added Previously covered by io ido Ido 2002-01-15 art wa wln Wallon 2002-01-29 roa li lim Limburgish 2002-08-02 gem ii iii Sichuan Yi 2002-10-14 sit an arg Aragonese 2002-12-23 roa ht hat Haitian Creole 2003-02-26 cpf I am not sure this was the best way to solve the problem... In ISO 3166-1 each country or dependent entity has BOTH an alpha-2 and an alpha-3 code point. In some cases it can be useful to use one and some cases to use the other one. It seems (from the request that originated this discussion) that it may be the same for official (or administrative) languages of indenpendant countries. If in ISO 639 things are frozen until the end of the world then...we'll have to wait for a long time ! Best regards FD 2011/4/18 Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> Should ISO 639-1 be formally stabilized? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CBFE19.D6C0ACE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Colleagues,

 

I agree with François: ISO 639-1

- should not be increased without very stringent reasons,

- may have to be modified, if necessary by a modification of a corresponding 3-letter symbol,

- very unlikely, but may have to be modified for other reasons,

and in that sense it is stabilized.

 

Given the above-mentioned reasons, I have always been strictly against a once and for all total “freeze” of ISO 639-1.

 

Best regards

Christian

 

 

From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Francois Demay
Sent: Montag, 18. April 2011 21:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 639-1

 

In a way IT IS stabilized.

see below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639-1

New ISO 639-1 codes are not added if an ISO 639-2 code exists, so systems that use ISO 639-1 and 639-2 codes, with 639-1 codes preferred, do not have to change existing codes.[1]

If an ISO 639-2 code that covers a group of languages is used, it might be overridden for some specific languages by a new ISO 639-1 code.

ISO 639-1 codes added after RFC publication in January 2001

ISO 639-1

ISO 639-2

Name

Date added

Previously covered by

io

ido

Ido

2002-01-15

art

wa

wln

Wallon

2002-01-29

roa

li

lim

Limburgish

2002-08-02

gem

ii

iii

Sichuan Yi

2002-10-14

sit

an

arg

Aragonese

2002-12-23

roa

ht

hat

Haitian Creole

2003-02-26

cpf

I am not sure this was the best way to solve the problem...

In ISO 3166-1 each country or dependent entity has BOTH an alpha-2 and an alpha-3 code point.
In some cases it can be useful to use one and some cases to use the other one.

It seems (from the request that originated this discussion) that it may be the same for official (or administrative) languages of indenpendant countries.

If in ISO 639 things are frozen until the end of the world then...we'll have to wait for a long time !

Best regards

FD

2011/4/18 Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

Should ISO 639-1 be formally stabilized?

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

 

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CBFE19.D6C0ACE0-- ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:44:38 +0100 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 639-1 In-Reply-To: [log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18 Apr 2011, at 20:57, Francois Demay wrote: > In a way IT IS stabilized. I mean formal ISO stabilization. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ ========================================================================Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:08:07 +0100 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 639-1 In-Reply-To: <001801cbfe09$1337dce0$39a796a0$@[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18 Apr 2011, at 21:42, Christian Galinski wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I agree with François: ISO 639-1 > - should not be increased without very stringent reasons, I understood that there was no rationale for any addition at all. > - may have to be modified, if necessary by a modification of a corresponding 3-letter symbol, Can you suggest an example of such a modification? > - very unlikely, but may have to be modified for other reasons, Can you suggest an example of such a modification? > and in that sense it is stabilized. That is not ISO formal stabilization (which we have for instance for ISO/IEC 8859-1) Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ ========================================================================Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:27:57 +0300 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Eeva Murtomaa <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Me too Eeva Stewart, Margaret wrote: > > I agree as well. > > Margaret > > *From:* ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Guenther, Rebecca > *Sent:* April-18-11 10:54 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name > > I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list. > > Rebecca > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Subject: Tetum, tet - French name > > Dear Colleagues, > > Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a > formal vote. > > I agree with the modification of the name in French. > > Best regards > > Christian > > *From:* ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee > [mailto:[log in to unmask] ] *On > Behalf Of *Håvard Hjulstad > *Sent:* Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Tetum, tet - French name > > Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee, > > Below is a request relating to the language *Tetum* (alpha-3 > identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: *tet*). The main request was > for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that > it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this > case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required > alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different > issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer. > > *_But_*: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database > has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I > have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also > found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with > -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as > “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in > English and French. > > *_My proposal_* is that we don’t do anything with the English name, > but that the French name is changed > FROM “tetum” > TO “tétoum; tetum”. > > /Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?/ > > Best regards, > Håvard > > /--------------------/ > > /Håvard Hjulstad/ > > / (prosjektleder / Project Manager)/ > > / Standard Norge / Standards Norway/ > > [log in to unmask] > ========================================================================Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:01:50 +0300 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Eeva Murtomaa <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Subject: Tetum, tet - French name In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Agree, Best wishes, Eeva Guenther, Rebecca wrote: > I also agree. We can add this form to the ISO 639-2 code list. > > Rebecca > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Christian Galinski [[log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:57 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Subject: Tetum, tet - French name > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > Håvard’s suggestions are reasonable and I think we do not need a > formal vote. > > I agree with the modification of the name in French. > > > > Best regards > > Christian > > > > > > *From:* ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee > [mailto:[log in to unmask] ] *On > Behalf Of *Håvard Hjulstad > *Sent:* Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 09:05 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Tetum, tet - French name > > > > Dear members of ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee, > > > > Below is a request relating to the language *Tetum* (alpha-3 > identifier in ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3: *tet*). The main request was > for an alpha-2 identifier. We have already informed the submitter that > it would be against our policy to assign an alpha-2 identifier in this > case. The main “problem” seemed to be that their software required > alpha-2 identifiers for languages, which is an entirely different > issue that we recommended her to discuss with their software manufacturer. > > > > *_But_*: The request uses the French form “tétoum”, while our database > has the French form “tetum” only. Having looked at various sources I > have found three French forms: tétoum, tetum, and tetun. I have also > found English forms Tetum and Tetun. While the name forms ending with > -n seem to be closer to the indigenous name of the language (given as > “tetun”), forms ending with -m are probably more common both in > English and French. > > > > *_My proposal_* is that we don’t do anything with the English name, > but that the French name is changed > FROM “tetum” > TO “tétoum; tetum”. > > > > /Any comments or objections? Does anyone want a formal ballot?/ > > > > Best regards, > Håvard > > > > /--------------------/ > > /Håvard Hjulstad/ > > / (prosjektleder / Project Manager)/ > > / Standard Norge / Standards Norway/ > > [log in to unmask] > ========================================================================Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:34:05 +0000 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: Peter Constable <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 639-1 In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 SSB3b3VsZCBoYXZlIG5vIG9iamVjdGlvbiB0byB0aGF0IHByb3Bvc2FsLg0KDQpQZXRlcg0KDQot LS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogSVNPIDYzOSBKb2ludCBBZHZpc29yeSBD b21taXR0ZWUgW21haWx0bzpJU09KQUNATElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVl0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE1p Y2hhZWwgRXZlcnNvbg0KU2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAxOCwgMjAxMSAxOjQ1IFBNDQpUbzog SVNPSkFDQExJU1RTRVJWLkxPQy5HT1YNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiA2MzktMQ0KDQpPbiAxOCBBcHIg MjAxMSwgYXQgMjA6NTcsIEZyYW5jb2lzIERlbWF5IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IEluIGEgd2F5IElUIElT IHN0YWJpbGl6ZWQuDQoNCkkgbWVhbiBmb3JtYWwgSVNPIHN0YWJpbGl6YXRpb24uDQoNCk1pY2hh ZWwgRXZlcnNvbiAqIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZXZlcnR5cGUuY29tLw0KDQo========================================================================Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:13:50 +0200 Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]> From: =?UTF-8?B?SMOldmFyZCBIanVsc3RhZA==?= <[log in to unmask]> Subject: SV: 639-1 In-Reply-To: A<[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBFF2A.CA8029EF" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFF2A.CA8029EF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SXQgY291bGQgcG9zc2libHkgc2ltcGxpZnkgdGhpbmdzIGlmIHdlIOKAnGFyZW7igJl0IGFsbG93 ZWQgdG/igJ0gYWRkIG5ldyBhbHBoYS0yIGlkZW50aWZpZXJzLCBhcyBvcHBvc2VkIHRvIOKAnGFy ZW7igJl0IGdvaW5nIHRv4oCdIGFkZCBuZXcgYWxwaGEtMiBpZGVudGlmaWVycy4gQnV0IOKAnGJ5 IG5hdHVyZeKAnSBJU08gc3RhbmRhcmRzIHNoYWxsIGJlIHJldmlld2VkIChhdCBsZWFzdCBldmVy eSBmaXZlIHllYXJzKSBhbmQgbWF5IGJlIGNoYW5nZWQgaWYgdGhlIGNvbW1pdHRlZSBtZW1iZXJz IHNvIGRlY2lkZS4gU28gd2hldGhlciB3ZSDigJxhcmVu4oCZdCBhbGxvd2VkIHRv4oCdIG9yIOKA nGFyZW7igJl0IGdvaW5nIHRvIiwgd2Ugd291bGQgaGF2ZSB0byBhZGQg4oCcdW5sZXNzIHNvbWV0 aGluZyBlbHNlIGlzIGRlY2lkZWTigJ0uDQoNCiANCg0KSVNPIDYzOSBpcyBnb2luZyB0byBjaGFu Z2UuIE9uZSBwYXJ0IG9mIHRoYXQgaXMgdGhlIG1lcmdpbmcgb2YgdGhlIHBhcnRzIGludG8gb25l LiBUaGVyZSB3aWxsIG9uZSBuZXcgImxpbmVhciIgZG9jdW1lbnQgZ2l2aW5nIGFsbCB0aGUgcnVs ZXMgb2YgSVNPIDYzOSBjb2Rlcy4gVGhhdCBkb2N1bWVudCBzaG91bGQgc3RhdGUgc29tZXRoaW5n IHRvIHRoZSBlZmZlY3QgdGhhdCB0aGUgYWxwaGEtMiBsYW5ndWFnZSBjb2RlIOKAnHdpbGwgcmVt YWluIHVubW9kaWZpZWTigJ0sIGJ1dCB0aGVyZSB3aWxsIGJlIGEgbmVlZCBmb3IgYW4g4oCcdW5s ZXNz4oCdIG9yIOKAnGV4Y2VwdOKAnTogTGFuZ3VhZ2UgZGVzaWduYXRpb25zIChub3QgaWRlbnRp ZmllcnMpIG1heSBuZWVkIHRvIGJlIGNoYW5nZWQgKG9idmlvdXNseSk7IGl0ZW1zIG1heSBiZSBy ZS1jbGFzc2lmaWVkIChlLmcuIGZyb20gaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBsYW5ndWFnZSB0byBtYWNyb2xhbmd1 YWdlKTsgZXRjLiBBbmQgaXQgaXMgdGhlIHNjb3BlIG9mIOKAnGV0Y+KAnSB0aGF0IGlzIHRoZSB0 cmlja3kgcGFydC4NCg0KIA0KDQpTbyBJIGFtIGJhc2ljYWxseSBmb3IuIFdlIG5lZWQgYSBzdHJv bmcgcnVsZSB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIHNpbXBsZSBhbmQgb2J2aW91cyBpbiBjYXNlcyBsaWtlIOKA nHRldOKAnS4NCg0KIA0KDQpIw6V2YXJkDQoNCiANCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCg0K SMOldmFyZCBIanVsc3RhZA0KDQogIChwcm9zamVrdGxlZGVyIC8gUHJvamVjdCBNYW5hZ2VyKQ0K DQogIFN0YW5kYXJkIE5vcmdlIC8gU3RhbmRhcmRzIE5vcndheQ0KDQogIGhoakBzdGFuZGFyZC5u bw0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KDQogDQoNCi0tLS0tT3BwcmlubmVsaWcgbWVsZGlu Zy0tLS0tDQpGcmE6IElTTyA2MzkgSm9pbnQgQWR2aXNvcnkgQ29tbWl0dGVlIFttYWlsdG86SVNP SkFDQExJU1RTRVJWLkxPQy5HT1ZdIFDDpSB2ZWduZSBhdiBQZXRlciBDb25zdGFibGUNClNlbmR0 OiAxOS4gYXByaWwgMjAxMSAxNzozNA0KVGlsOiBJU09KQUNATElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVg0KRW1u ZTogUmU6IDYzOS0xDQoNCiANCg0KSSB3b3VsZCBoYXZlIG5vIG9iamVjdGlvbiB0byB0aGF0IHBy b3Bvc2FsLg0KDQogDQoNClBldGVyDQoNCiANCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0N Cg0KRnJvbTogSVNPIDYzOSBKb2ludCBBZHZpc29yeSBDb21taXR0ZWUgW21haWx0bzpJU09KQUNA TElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVl0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE1pY2hhZWwgRXZlcnNvbg0KDQpTZW50OiBN b25kYXksIEFwcmlsIDE4LCAyMDExIDE6NDUgUE0NCg0KVG86IElTT0pBQ0BMSVNUU0VSVi5MT0Mu R09WDQoNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiA2MzktMQ0KDQogDQoNCk9uIDE4IEFwciAyMDExLCBhdCAyMDo1 NywgRnJhbmNvaXMgRGVtYXkgd3JvdGU6DQoNCiANCg0KPiBJbiBhIHdheSBJVCBJUyBzdGFiaWxp emVkLg0KDQogDQoNCkkgbWVhbiBmb3JtYWwgSVNPIHN0YWJpbGl6YXRpb24uDQoNCiANCg0KTWlj aGFlbCBFdmVyc29uICogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5ldmVydHlwZS5jb20vDQoNCiANCg0K ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFF2A.CA8029EF Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+PGhlYWQ+PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj1Db250ZW50LVR5cGUgY29udGVu dD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij48bWV0YSBuYW1lPUdlbmVyYXRvciBjb250ZW50 PSJNaWNyb3NvZnQgV29yZCAxMiAoZmlsdGVyZWQgbWVkaXVtKSI+PHN0eWxlPjwhLS0NCi8qIEZv bnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0 aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQt ZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhczsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgOSAyIDIgNCAz IDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1h bCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW4tdG9wOjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGNtOw0K CW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206Ni4wcHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MGNtOw0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4w cHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkFyaWFsIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7fQ0KaDENCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxl LXByaW9yaXR5Ojk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6Ik92ZXJza3JpZnQgMSBUZWduIjsNCgltYXJn aW4tdG9wOjI0LjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206Ni4wcHQ7 DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MGNtOw0KCXBhZ2UtYnJlYWstYWZ0ZXI6YXZvaWQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXpl OjE0LjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQXJpYWwiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMzY1 RjkxO30NCmgyDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5Ow0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJPdmVy c2tyaWZ0IDIgVGVnbiI7DQoJbWFyZ2luLXRvcDo2LjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGNtOw0K CW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206Ni4wcHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MGNtOw0KCXBhZ2UtYnJlYWstYWZ0 ZXI6YXZvaWQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQXJpYWwiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojNEY4MUJEO30NCnAuTXNvVGl0bGUsIGxpLk1zb1RpdGxlLCBkaXYu TXNvVGl0bGUNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5OjEwOw0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJUaXR0 ZWwgVGVnbiI7DQoJbWFyZ2luLXRvcDowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tOjEyLjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW4tbGVmdDowY207DQoJYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7DQoJcGFkZGlu ZzowY207DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjI2LjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFu Iiwic2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMxNzM2NUQ7DQoJbGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6LjI1cHQ7fQ0KcC5N c29UaXRsZUN4U3BGaXJzdCwgbGkuTXNvVGl0bGVDeFNwRmlyc3QsIGRpdi5Nc29UaXRsZUN4U3BG aXJzdA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6MTA7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IlRpdHRlbCBU ZWduIjsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCgltYXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdp bi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglib3JkZXI6bm9uZTsNCglwYWRkaW5nOjBjbTsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MjYuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7DQoJY29s b3I6IzE3MzY1RDsNCglsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzouMjVwdDt9DQpwLk1zb1RpdGxlQ3hTcE1pZGRs ZSwgbGkuTXNvVGl0bGVDeFNwTWlkZGxlLCBkaXYuTXNvVGl0bGVDeFNwTWlkZGxlDQoJe21zby1z dHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eToxMDsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtbGluazoiVGl0dGVsIFRlZ24iOw0KCW1zby1z dHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5Ow0KCW1hcmdpbjowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTouMDAw MXB0Ow0KCWJvcmRlcjpub25lOw0KCXBhZGRpbmc6MGNtOw0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToyNi4wcHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIsInNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMTczNjVEOw0K CWxldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOi4yNXB0O30NCnAuTXNvVGl0bGVDeFNwTGFzdCwgbGkuTXNvVGl0bGVD eFNwTGFzdCwgZGl2Lk1zb1RpdGxlQ3hTcExhc3QNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5OjEwOw0K CW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJUaXR0ZWwgVGVnbiI7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9u bHk7DQoJbWFyZ2luLXRvcDowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9t OjEyLjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW4tbGVmdDowY207DQoJYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7DQoJcGFkZGluZzowY207 DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjI2LjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIiwic2Vy aWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMxNzM2NUQ7DQoJbGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6LjI1cHQ7fQ0KcC5Nc29TdWJ0 aXRsZSwgbGkuTXNvU3VidGl0bGUsIGRpdi5Nc29TdWJ0aXRsZQ0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3Jp dHk6MTE7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IlVuZGVydGl0dGVsIFRlZ24iOw0KCW1hcmdpbi10b3A6 MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1yaWdodDowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTo2LjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW4t bGVmdDowY207DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJv bWFuIiwic2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiM0RjgxQkQ7DQoJbGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6Ljc1cHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1zdHlsZTppdGFsaWM7fQ0KYTpsaW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5 bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5l O30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJp b3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0K cC5Nc29QbGFpblRleHQsIGxpLk1zb1BsYWluVGV4dCwgZGl2Lk1zb1BsYWluVGV4dA0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IlJlbiB0ZWtzdCBUZWduIjsNCglt YXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNvbnNvbGFzO30NCnAuTXNvTm9TcGFjaW5nLCBsaS5Nc29Ob1NwYWNpbmcs IGRpdi5Nc29Ob1NwYWNpbmcNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5OjE7DQoJbWFyZ2luOjBjbTsN CgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWls eToiQXJpYWwiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjt9DQpzcGFuLk92ZXJza3JpZnQxVGVnbg0KCXttc28tc3R5 bGUtbmFtZToiT3ZlcnNrcmlmdCAxIFRlZ24iOw0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5Ow0KCW1z by1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJPdmVyc2tyaWZ0IDEiOw0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJBcmlhbCIsInNhbnMt c2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMzNjVGOTE7DQoJZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZDt9DQpzcGFuLk92ZXJz a3JpZnQyVGVnbg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZToiT3ZlcnNrcmlmdCAyIFRlZ24iOw0KCW1zby1z dHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5Ow0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJPdmVyc2tyaWZ0IDIiOw0KCWZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OiJBcmlhbCIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiM0RjgxQkQ7DQoJZm9udC13ZWln aHQ6Ym9sZDt9DQpzcGFuLlRpdHRlbFRlZ24NCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLW5hbWU6IlRpdHRlbCBUZWdu IjsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6MTA7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6VGl0dGVsOw0KCWZv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6IzE3MzY1RDsNCgls ZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzouMjVwdDt9DQpzcGFuLlVuZGVydGl0dGVsVGVnbg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUt bmFtZToiVW5kZXJ0aXR0ZWwgVGVnbiI7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5OjExOw0KCW1zby1z dHlsZS1saW5rOlVuZGVydGl0dGVsOw0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJz ZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6IzRGODFCRDsNCglsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzouNzVwdDsNCglmb250LXN0 eWxlOml0YWxpYzt9DQpzcGFuLlJlbnRla3N0VGVnbg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZToiUmVuIHRl a3N0IFRlZ24iOw0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtbGluazoiUmVu IHRla3N0IjsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhczt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTt9DQpAcGFnZSBXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7c2l6ZTo2MTIu MHB0IDc5Mi4wcHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luOjcwLjg1cHQgNzAuODVwdCA3MC44NXB0IDcwLjg1cHQ7fQ0K ZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1b aWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1h eD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0K PG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9 IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5IGxh bmc9RU4tR0IgbGluaz1ibHVlIHZsaW5rPXB1cnBsZT48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMT48 cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+SXQgY291bGQgcG9zc2libHkgc2ltcGxpZnkgdGhpbmdzIGlm IHdlIOKAnGFyZW7igJl0IDx1PmFsbG93ZWQ8L3U+IHRv4oCdIGFkZCBuZXcgYWxwaGEtMiBpZGVu dGlmaWVycywgYXMgb3Bwb3NlZCB0byDigJxhcmVu4oCZdCA8dT5nb2luZzwvdT4gdG/igJ0gYWRk IG5ldyBhbHBoYS0yIGlkZW50aWZpZXJzLiBCdXQg4oCcYnkgbmF0dXJl4oCdIElTTyBzdGFuZGFy ZHMgc2hhbGwgYmUgcmV2aWV3ZWQgKGF0IGxlYXN0IGV2ZXJ5IGZpdmUgeWVhcnMpIGFuZCBtYXkg YmUgY2hhbmdlZCBpZiB0aGUgY29tbWl0dGVlIG1lbWJlcnMgc28gZGVjaWRlLiBTbyB3aGV0aGVy IHdlIOKAnGFyZW7igJl0IGFsbG93ZWQgdG/igJ0gb3Ig4oCcYXJlbuKAmXQgZ29pbmcgdG8mcXVv dDssIHdlIHdvdWxkIGhhdmUgdG8gYWRkIOKAnHVubGVzcyBzb21ldGhpbmcgZWxzZSBpcyBkZWNp ZGVk4oCdLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+SVNPIDYzOSBpcyBnb2luZyB0byBjaGFuZ2Uu IE9uZSBwYXJ0IG9mIHRoYXQgaXMgdGhlIG1lcmdpbmcgb2YgdGhlIHBhcnRzIGludG8gb25lLiBU aGVyZSB3aWxsIG9uZSBuZXcgJnF1b3Q7bGluZWFyJnF1b3Q7IGRvY3VtZW50IGdpdmluZyBhbGwg dGhlIHJ1bGVzIG9mIElTTyA2MzkgY29kZXMuIFRoYXQgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2hvdWxkIHN0YXRlIHNv bWV0aGluZyB0byB0aGUgZWZmZWN0IHRoYXQgdGhlIGFscGhhLTIgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgY29kZSDigJx3 aWxsIHJlbWFpbiB1bm1vZGlmaWVk4oCdLCBidXQgdGhlcmUgd2lsbCBiZSBhIG5lZWQgZm9yIGFu IOKAnHVubGVzc+KAnSBvciDigJxleGNlcHTigJ06IExhbmd1YWdlIGRlc2lnbmF0aW9ucyAobm90 IGlkZW50aWZpZXJzKSBtYXkgbmVlZCB0byBiZSBjaGFuZ2VkIChvYnZpb3VzbHkpOyBpdGVtcyBt YXkgYmUgcmUtY2xhc3NpZmllZCAoZS5nLiBmcm9tIGluZGl2aWR1YWwgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgdG8gbWFj cm9sYW5ndWFnZSk7IGV0Yy4gQW5kIGl0IGlzIHRoZSBzY29wZSBvZiDigJxldGPigJ0gdGhhdCBp cyB0aGUgdHJpY2t5IHBhcnQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0Pjxv OnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD5TbyBJIGFtIGJhc2ljYWxs eSBmb3IuIFdlIG5lZWQgYSBzdHJvbmcgcnVsZSB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIHNpbXBsZSBhbmQgb2J2 aW91cyBpbiBjYXNlcyBsaWtlIOKAnHRldOKAnS48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Q bGFpblRleHQ+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PkjDpXZh cmQ8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48 L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBs YW5nPU5PLUJPSz5Iw6V2YXJkIEhqdWxzdGFkPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNz PU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz7CoCAocHJvc2pla3RsZWRlciAvIFByb2pl Y3QgTWFuYWdlcik8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0Pjxz cGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPiZuYnNwOyBTdGFuZGFyZCBOb3JnZSAvIFN0YW5kYXJkcyBOb3J3YXk8 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8t Qk9LPiZuYnNwOyBoaGpAc3RhbmRhcmQubm88bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9 TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPG86cD48 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz48 bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0Pi0tLS0tT3Bw cmlubmVsaWcgbWVsZGluZy0tLS0tPGJyPkZyYTogSVNPIDYzOSBKb2ludCBBZHZpc29yeSBDb21t aXR0ZWUgW21haWx0bzpJU09KQUNATElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVl0gUMOlIHZlZ25lIGF2IFBldGVy IENvbnN0YWJsZTxicj5TZW5kdDogMTkuIGFwcmlsIDIwMTEgMTc6MzQ8YnI+VGlsOiBJU09KQUNA TElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVjxicj5FbW5lOiBSZTogNjM5LTE8c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz48bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9L PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4g bGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+SSB3b3VsZCBoYXZlIG5vIG9iamVjdGlvbiB0byB0aGF0IHByb3Bvc2FsLjxv OnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1C T0s+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3Bh biBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz5QZXRlcjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFp blRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNs YXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz4tLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2Ut LS0tLTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFu Zz1OTy1CT0s+RnJvbTogSVNPIDYzOSBKb2ludCBBZHZpc29yeSBDb21taXR0ZWUgW21haWx0bzpJ U09KQUNATElTVFNFUlYuTE9DLkdPVl0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE1pY2hhZWwgRXZlcnNvbjxvOnA+ PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+ U2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAxOCwgMjAxMSAxOjQ1IFBNPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9w PjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz5UbzogSVNPSkFDQExJU1RT RVJWLkxPQy5HT1Y8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0Pjxz cGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiA2MzktMTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48 cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48 L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz5PbiAxOCBB cHIgMjAxMSwgYXQgMjA6NTcsIEZyYW5jb2lzIERlbWF5IHdyb3RlOjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFu PjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29QbGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz4m Z3Q7IEluIGEgd2F5IElUIElTIHN0YWJpbGl6ZWQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNs YXNzPU1zb1BsYWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPkkgbWVhbiBmb3Jt YWwgSVNPIHN0YWJpbGl6YXRpb24uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb1Bs YWluVGV4dD48c3BhbiBsYW5nPU5PLUJPSz48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHAg Y2xhc3M9TXNvUGxhaW5UZXh0PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9Tk8tQk9LPk1pY2hhZWwgRXZlcnNvbiAqIGh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuZXZlcnR5cGUuY29tLzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD48cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Q bGFpblRleHQ+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1OTy1CT0s+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjwv ZGl2PjwvYm9keT48L2h0bWw+ ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBFF2A.CA8029EF--