Print

Print


On 22 Jul 2011, at 18:38, Peter Constable wrote:

> I agree with Havard completely. And I do not think that Michael has refuted any of my points.  (He had said, 'Peter's example "ftp://" is not relevant', though I was basically saying the same thing: that labels appearing in those protocol elements are not a problem.)

ftp:// is entirely different from ftp.wikipedia.org

www:// is meaningless in every context.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/