 |
 |
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Denenberg, Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'll be away the next two weeks (and much of the week following). It would be good if those of you who have time could review the specification: > > http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/spec.html > > and the bnf > > http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/bnf.html > > during the next three weeks. > > I'd like to think that the spec is stable, but I suspect that there are some errors/discrepancies in the bnf. BNFs are always better when more people look at them. FWIW, one of the developers I work with (on CSL) created a Ruby implementation based on the spec. <https://github.com/inukshuk/edtf-ruby> Bruce